<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Cancer Urology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Cancer Urology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Онкоурология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1726-9776</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1996-1812</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">362</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-4-58-64</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PROSTATE CANCER</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>РАК ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR LOCALIZED AND LOCALLY-ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ФАКТОРЫ ПРОГНОЗА БИОХИМИЧЕСКОГО РЕЦИДИВА ЛОКАЛИЗОВАННОГО И МЕСТНО-РАСПРОСТРАНЕННОГО РАКА ПРОСТАТЫ ПОСЛЕ РАДИКАЛЬНОЙ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИИ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chernyaev</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Черняев</surname><given-names>В. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of oncology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Кафедра онкологии</p></bio><email>chercrc@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Matveev</surname><given-names>V. B.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Матвеев</surname><given-names>В. Б.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>department of urology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>отделение урологии</p></bio><email>chercrc@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Volkova</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Волкова</surname><given-names>М. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>department of urology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>отделение урологии</p></bio><email>chercrc@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nikiforova</surname><given-names>Z. N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Никифорова</surname><given-names>З. Н.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>лаборатория онкопротеомики отделения профилактики и эпидемиологии опухолей НИИ канцерогенеза</p></bio><email>chercrc@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shevchenko</surname><given-names>V. E.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шевченко</surname><given-names>В. Е.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>лаборатория онкопротеомики отделения профилактики и эпидемиологии опухолей НИИ канцерогенеза</p></bio><email>chercrc@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">FPDO MGMSU</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФПДО МГМСУ</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Blokhin Cancer research center</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина» РАМН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Oncoproteomics laboratory research institute of Cancerogenesis N.N. Blokhin Cancer research center, Moscow</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина» РАМН, Москва</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2012-12-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>12</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>58</fpage><lpage>64</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2014-08-08"><day>08</day><month>08</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2014-08-08"><day>08</day><month>08</month><year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/362">https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/362</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold><italic>Purpose. </italic></bold><italic>To reveal prognostic factors of PSA-failure following radical prostatectomy in patients with localized and locally-advanced prostate cancer.</italic></p><p><bold><italic>Materials and methods. </italic></bold><italic>Medical data of 386 consecutive patients with localized and locally-advanced prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy from 1997 to 2011 were analyzed. Median age was 61.0 years. Median PSA before surgery – 10.3 ng/ml. Plasma levels of VEGF, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, TGF-</italic><italic>β</italic><italic>1, CD105, IL-6 were measured using Enzyme Linked-Immuno-Sorbent Assay (ELISA) before radical prostatectomy in 77 patients. Postoperatively the tumours were categorized as pT2 in 288 (59.1 %), pT3 – in 144 (37.3 %), pT4 – in 14 (3.6); pN+ – in 34 (8.8 %) cases. Gleason score &lt; 7 was present in 254 (65.8 %), </italic> <italic>7 – in 132 (34.2 %) specimens. Perineural invasion was identified in 188 (48.7 %), angiolymphatic invasion – in 126 (32.6) cases.</italic></p><p><bold><italic>Results. </italic></bold><italic>Biochemical recurrence occurred in 64 (16.6 %) out of 386 patients at a median follow-up of 30.5 (12</italic>−<italic>164) months. Independent predictors of biochemical recurrence were PSA (HR 0.161 (95% CI:0.058</italic>−<italic>0.449); </italic><italic>р</italic><italic> = 0.001), Gleason sum in surgical specimens (HR 0.496 (95 % CI:0.268</italic>−<italic>0.917); p = 0.025), pN (HR 0.415 (95 % CI:0.181</italic>−<italic>0.955); p = 0.039). The patients were divided into 3 prognostic groups: good (0 factor), intermediate (1 factor), poor (2 factors) and very poor (3 factors) (AUC – 0.720 (95% CI: 0.656</italic>−<italic>0.784)). High preoperative levels VEGF (</italic> <italic>67 pg/ml) (</italic><italic>р</italic><italic> = 0.005), VEGFR2 (</italic> <italic>3149 pg/ml) (</italic><italic>р</italic><italic> = 0.036), VEGFR3 (</italic> <italic>2268 pg/ml) (</italic><italic>р</italic><italic> = 0.001), TGF-</italic><italic>β</italic><italic>1 (</italic> <italic>14473 pg/ml) (</italic><italic>р</italic><italic> = 0.052) were identified as unfavorable prognostic factors for survival without PSA-failure. </italic></p><p><bold><italic>Conclusion. </italic></bold><italic>Independent prognostic factors of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy were PSA, Gleason sum and pN. Joint effect of the factors allows to predict PSA-relapse with accuracy 0.720. Preoperative serum levels VEGF, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, TGF-</italic><italic>β</italic><italic>1 potentially are perspective markers for PSA-failure after surgical treatment prostate cancer, further trials are needed.</italic></p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold><italic>Цель исследования: </italic></bold><italic>выявить факторы прогноза биохимического рецидива у больных раком предстательной железы, подвергнутых</italic><italic> </italic><italic>радикальной простатэктомии.</italic></p><p><bold><italic>Материалы и методы. </italic></bold><italic>Проанализированы результаты лечения 386 больных раком предстательной железы Т2-4N0-1M0, подвергнутых радикальной простатэктомии (РПЭ) в РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН, в период с 1997 по 2011 г. Медиана возраста –</italic><italic> </italic><italic>61,0 года. Медиана концентрации простатспецифического антигена (ПСА) до лечения – 10,3 нг/мл. У 77 больных проводилась</italic><italic> </italic><italic>количественная оценка плазменного содержания VEGF, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, TGF-</italic><italic>β</italic><italic>1, CD105, IL-6 методом ELISA до операции.</italic><italic> </italic><italic>Всем больным выполнена РПЭ. Категория рТ расценена как рТ2 у 228 (59,1 %), рТ3 – у 144 (37,3 %), рТ4 – у 14 (3,6 %) больных;</italic><italic> </italic><italic>категория рN+ диагностирована в 34 (8,8 %) случаях. Сумма баллов по шкале Глисона (индекс Глисона) &lt; 7 выявлена у 254</italic><italic> </italic><italic>(65,8 %), </italic> <italic>7 – у 132 (34,2 %) пациентов. Периневральная инвазия имела место в 188 (48,7 %), ангиолимфатическая – в 126 (32,6 %)</italic><italic> </italic><italic>случаях. Медиана наблюдения – 30,5 (12</italic>−<italic>164) мес.</italic></p><p><bold><italic>Результаты. </italic></bold><italic>Рецидивы зарегистрированы у 64 (16,6 %) из 386 больных в среднем через 17,6 мес после операции. В многофакторном</italic><italic> </italic><italic>анализе выявлена независимая прогностическая значимость уровня ПСА (отношение рисков (ОР) 0,161 (95 % ДИ 0,058</italic>−<italic>0,449);</italic><italic> </italic><italic>р = 0,001), операционного индекса Глисона (ОР 0,496 (95 % ДИ 0,268</italic>−<italic>0,917); p = 0,025) и категории рN (ОР 0,415 (95 % ДИ</italic><italic> </italic><italic>0,181</italic>−<italic>0,955); p = 0,039). В зависимости от числа независимых факторов риска развития ПСА-рецидива пациенты разделены на</italic><italic> </italic><italic>группы хорошего (0 факторов), промежуточного (1 фактор), плохого (2 фактора) и очень плохого (3 фактора) прогноза. Предсказательная точность модели – 0,720 (95 % ДИ 0,656</italic>−<italic>0,784). Высокие дооперационные плазменные концентрации VEGF</italic><italic> </italic><italic>(</italic> <italic>67 пкг/мл) (р = 0,005), VEGFR2 (</italic> <italic>3149 пкг/мл) (р = 0,036), VEGFR3 (</italic> <italic>2268 пкг/мл) (р = 0,001), TGF-</italic><italic>β</italic><italic>1 (</italic> <italic>14473 пкг/мл)</italic><italic> </italic><italic>(р = 0,052) являлись факторами неблагоприятного прогноза выживаемости без ПСА-рецидива.</italic></p><p><bold><italic>Заключение. </italic></bold><italic>Независимыми факторами риска ПСА-рецидива после радикальной простатэктомии являются ПСА, операционный</italic><italic> </italic><italic>индекс Глисона и категория pN. Сочетанное использование данных признаков позволяет прогнозировать биохимическое прогрессирование с точностью 0,720. Предоперационные концентрации VEGF, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, TGF-</italic><italic>β</italic><italic>1 в плазме крови потенциально</italic><italic> </italic><italic>являются перспективными маркерами биохимического рецидива РПЖ после хирургического лечения и нуждаются в дальнейшем</italic><italic> </italic><italic>изучении.</italic> </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>prostate cancer</kwd><kwd>radical prostatectomy</kwd><kwd>biochemical recurrence</kwd><kwd>VEGF</kwd><kwd>VEGFR2</kwd><kwd>VEGFR3</kwd><kwd>TGF-β1</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рак предстательной железы</kwd><kwd>радикальная простатэктомия</kwd><kwd>биохимический рецидив</kwd><kwd>VEGF</kwd><kwd>VEGFR2</kwd><kwd>VEGFR3</kwd><kwd>TGF-β1</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Данное исследование было проведено благодаря гранту, полученному Российским обществом онкоурологов.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Stephenson A.J., Scardino P.T., Eastham J.A. et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7005−12.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stephenson A.J., Scardino P.T., Eastham J.A. et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7005−12.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. D'Amico A.V., Moul J., Carroll P.R. et al. Prostate specific antigen doubling time as a surrogate end point for prostate cancer specific mortality following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Urol 2004;172(5 Pt 2):42−6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">D'Amico A.V., Moul J., Carroll P.R. et al. Prostate specific antigen doubling time as a surrogate end point for prostate cancer specific mortality following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Urol 2004;172(5 Pt 2):42−6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Kattan M.W., Wheeler T.M., Scardino P.T. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17: 1499−507.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kattan M.W., Wheeler T.M., Scardino P.T. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17: 1499−507.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Stephenson A.J., Scardino P.T., Eastham J.A. et al. Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:715−17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stephenson A.J., Scardino P.T., Eastham J.A. et al. Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:715−17.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. Stephenson A.J., Scardino P.T., Eastham J.A. et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy, J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:7005−12.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stephenson A.J., Scardino P.T., Eastham J.A. et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy, J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:7005−12.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Bianco F.J. Jr., Kattan M.W., Scardino P.T. et al. Radical prostatectomy nomograms in black American men: accuracy and applicability. J Urol 2003;170: 73−6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bianco F.J. Jr., Kattan M.W., Scardino P.T. et al. Radical prostatectomy nomograms in black American men: accuracy and applicability. J Urol 2003;170: 73−6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Shahrokh F. Shariat, Jose A. Karam, JochenWalz et al. Improved prediction of disease relapse after radical prostatectomy through a panel of preoperative blood-based biomarkers. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14(12).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shahrokh F. Shariat, Jose A. Karam, JochenWalz et al. Improved prediction of disease relapse after radical prostatectomy through a panel of preoperative blood-based biomarkers. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14(12).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Schroder F.H. Management of locally advanced prostate cancer. Staging, natural history, and results of radical surgery. World J Urol 2000;18(3):194−203.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schroder F.H. Management of locally advanced prostate cancer. Staging, natural history, and results of radical surgery. World J Urol 2000;18(3):194−203.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Wheeler T.M., Dillioglugil O., Kattan M.W. et al. Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer. Hum Pathol 1998;29(8):856−62.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wheeler T.M., Dillioglugil O., Kattan M.W. et al. Clinical and pathological significance of the level and extent of capsular invasion in clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer. Hum Pathol 1998;29(8):856−62.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. Hull G.W., Rabbani F., Abbas F. et al. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002;167(2 Pt 1):528−34.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hull G.W., Rabbani F., Abbas F. et al. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002;167(2 Pt 1):528−34.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. de la Taille A., Rubin M.A., Buttyan R. et al. Is microvascular invasion on radical prostatectomy specimens a useful predictor of PSA recurrence for prostate cancer patients? Eur Urol 2000;38:79−84.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">de la Taille A., Rubin M.A., Buttyan R. et al. Is microvascular invasion on radical prostatectomy specimens a useful predictor of PSA recurrence for prostate cancer patients? Eur Urol 2000;38:79−84.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12. May M., Kaufmann O., Hammermann F. et al. Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens. BJU 2006;99:539−44.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">May M., Kaufmann O., Hammermann F. et al. Prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens. BJU 2006;99:539−44.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13. Maru N., Villers A., McNeal J.E. et al. The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol 1989;142:763−8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maru N., Villers A., McNeal J.E. et al. The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol 1989;142:763−8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14. Faruk Ozcan. Correlation of perineural Invasion on radical prostatectomy specimens with other pathologic prognostic factors and PSA failure. Eur Urol 2001;40:308−12.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Faruk Ozcan. Correlation of perineural Invasion on radical prostatectomy specimens with other pathologic prognostic factors and PSA failure. Eur Urol 2001;40:308−12.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15. Shelley M.D., Kumar S., Wilt T. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 2009;35:19−7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shelley M.D., Kumar S., Wilt T. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 2009;35:19−7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16. Bianco F.J., Grignon D.J., Sakr W.A. et al. Radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: impact of a positive margin. Eur Urol 2003;43(5):461−6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bianco F.J., Grignon D.J., Sakr W.A. et al. Radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: impact of a positive margin. Eur Urol 2003;43(5):461−6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">17. Ward J.F., Zincke H., Bergstralh E.J. et al. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excixion) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004; 172:1328−32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ward J.F., Zincke H., Bergstralh E.J. et al. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excixion) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004; 172:1328−32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">18. Simon M.A., Kim S., Soloway M.S. Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins. J Urol 2006;175(1):140−4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Simon M.A., Kim S., Soloway M.S. Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins. J Urol 2006;175(1):140−4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">19. Wright J.L., Dalkin B.L., True L.D. et al. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality. J Urol 2010;183(6):2213−8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wright J.L., Dalkin B.L., True L.D. et al. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality. J Urol 2010;183(6):2213−8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">20. Alkhateeb S., Alibhai S., Fleshner N. et al. Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy differs by disease risk group. J Urol 2010;183(1):145−50.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alkhateeb S., Alibhai S., Fleshner N. et al. Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy differs by disease risk group. J Urol 2010;183(1):145−50.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">21. Shikanov S., Song J., Royce C. et al. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. J Urol 2009;182(1):139−44.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shikanov S., Song J., Royce C. et al. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence. J Urol 2009;182(1):139−44.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">22. Albadine R., Hyndman M.E., Chaux A.et al. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center. Hum Pathol 2012;43(2):254−60.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Albadine R., Hyndman M.E., Chaux A.et al. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center. Hum Pathol 2012;43(2):254−60.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">23. Shariat S.F., Menesses-Diaz A., Kim I.Y.et al. Tissue expression of transforming growth factor-h1 and its receptors: correlation with pathologic features and biochemical progression in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urology 2004;63:1191−7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shariat S.F., Menesses-Diaz A., Kim I.Y.et al. Tissue expression of transforming growth factor-h1 and its receptors: correlation with pathologic features and biochemical progression in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urology 2004;63:1191−7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">24. Kattan M.W., Shariat S.F., Andrews B. et al. The addition of interleukin-6 soluble receptor and transforming growth factor beta1 improves a preoperative nomogram for predicting biochemical progression in patients with clinically locali-zed prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3573.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kattan M.W., Shariat S.F., Andrews B. et al. The addition of interleukin-6 soluble receptor and transforming growth factor beta1 improves a preoperative nomogram for predicting biochemical progression in patients with clinically locali-zed prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3573.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
