<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Cancer Urology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Cancer Urology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Онкоурология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1726-9776</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1996-1812</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">339</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-3-88-91</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CLINICAL CASE</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КЛИНИЧЕСКИЙ СЛУЧАЙ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">VERIFICATION OF A TUMOR LESION OF INTRAPELVIC LYMPH NODES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. THE FIRST EXPERIENCE</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ВЕРИФИКАЦИЯ ОПУХОЛЕВОГО ПОРАЖЕНИЯ ВНУТРИТАЗОВЫХ ЛИМФАТИЧЕСКИХ УЗЛОВ ПОСЛЕ РАДИКАЛЬНОЙ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИИ. ПЕРВЫЙ ОПЫТ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kapustin</surname><given-names>V. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Капустин</surname><given-names>В. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>wwkapustin@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shirokorad</surname><given-names>V. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Широкорад</surname><given-names>В. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>wwkapustin@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gromov</surname><given-names>A. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Громов</surname><given-names>А. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>wwkapustin@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Koshurnikov</surname><given-names>D. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кошурников</surname><given-names>Д. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>wwkapustin@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow City Cancer Hospital Sixty-Two</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Московская городская онкологическая больница № 62</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2012-09-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>88</fpage><lpage>91</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2014-08-06"><day>06</day><month>08</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2014-08-06"><day>06</day><month>08</month><year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/339">https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/339</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Objective: </bold>to study the possibilities of transrectal ultrasound scan (TRUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying and verifying a tumor lesion of intrapelvic lymph nodes (LN) in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.</p><p><bold>Subjects and methods. </bold>Metastatic tumor lesion of intrapelvic LNs was verified in 4 patients by transrectal ultrasound (US)-guided needle biopsies. All the patients underwent multi-parametric MRI studies and TRUS.</p><p><bold>Results. </bold>The application of current MRI technologies (for qualitative and quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted images and for postcontrast sequences) could detect and judge with confidence the metastatic lesion of intrapelvic LNs. TRUS permits clearly visualizing pathologically altered LNs, by taking into account their MRI pattern and verifying their tumor lesion by US-guided core needle biopsy.</p><p><bold>Conclusion. </bold>The combined use of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS provides a means for diagnosing and verifying the tumor lesion of pelvic LNs in patients after prostatectomy.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Цель исследования </bold>— изучение возможностей трансректального ультразвукового исследования (ТРУЗИ) и магнитно-резонансной томографии (МРТ) в выявлении и верификации опухолевого поражения внутритазовых лимфатических узлов (ЛУ) у пациентов с биохимическим рецидивом после радикальной простатэктомии.</p><p><bold>Материалы и методы. </bold>Метастатическое опухолевое поражение внутритазовых ЛУ было верифицировано у 4 пациентов при помощи пункционных биопсий под трансректальным ультразвуковым (УЗ) наведением. Всем пациентам были выполнены мультипараметрические МРТ-исследования, а также ТРУЗИ.</p><p><bold>Результаты. </bold>Применение современных МРТ-технологий (качественного и количественного анализа диффузионно-взвешенных изображений, а также постконтрастных последовательностей) позволило выявлять и уверенно судить о наличии метастатического поражения внутритазовых ЛУ. ТРУЗИ позволяет четко визуализировать патологически измененные ЛУ с учетом МРТ-картины, а также верифицировать их опухолевое поражение при помощи прицельной пункционной биопсии под УЗ-наведением.</p><p><bold>Выводы. </bold>Сочетанное использование мультипараметрической МРТ и ТРУЗИ позволяет распознавать и верифицировать опухолевое поражение тазовых ЛУ у пациентов, перенесших простатэктомию.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>local recurrence of prostate cancer</kwd><kwd>radical prostatectomy</kwd><kwd>biopsy</kwd><kwd>magnetic resonance imaging</kwd><kwd>transrectal ultrasound study</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>локальный рецидив рака предстательной железы</kwd><kwd>радикальная простатэктомия</kwd><kwd>биопсия</kwd><kwd>магнитно-резонансная томография</kwd><kwd>трансректальное ультразвуковое исследование</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Клинические рекомендации. Онкология. Под ред. В.И. Чиссова, С.Л. Дарьяловой. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2008. С. 428−30.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Клинические рекомендации. Онкология. Под ред. В.И. Чиссова, С.Л. Дарьяловой. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2008. С. 428−30.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Scattoni V., Montorsi F., Piccho M. et al. Diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2004:93:680−8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scattoni V., Montorsi F., Piccho M. et al. Diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2004:93:680−8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Roscigno M., Scattoni V., Raber M. et al. Role of prostate fossa ultrasonography in the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy in case of PSA failure. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2002;74(4):304−8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roscigno M., Scattoni V., Raber M. et al. Role of prostate fossa ultrasonography in the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy in case of PSA failure. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2002;74(4):304−8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Vargas H.A., Wassberg C., Akin O., Hricak H. MR imaging of treated prostate cancer. Radiology 2012;262(1):26−42.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vargas H.A., Wassberg C., Akin O., Hricak H. MR imaging of treated prostate cancer. Radiology 2012;262(1):26−42.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. Giannarini G., Nguyen D.P., Thalmann G.N., Thoeny H.C. Diffusionweighted magnetic resonance imaging detects local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: initial experience. Eur Urol 2012;61(3):616−20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Giannarini G., Nguyen D.P., Thalmann G.N., Thoeny H.C. Diffusionweighted magnetic resonance imaging detects local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: initial experience. Eur Urol 2012;61(3):616−20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Meijer H.J., van Lin E.N., Debats O.A. et al. High occurrence of aberrant lymph node spread on magnetic resonance lymphography in prostate cancer patients with a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;82:1405−10.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Meijer H.J., van Lin E.N., Debats O.A. et al. High occurrence of aberrant lymph node spread on magnetic resonance lymphography in prostate cancer patients with a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;82:1405−10.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Valotto C., Falconieri G., Pizzolitto S. et al. Residual prostatic tumour in the surgical bed following radical prostatectomy in organconfined prostate cancer: possible prognostic significance. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2011; 83(2):78−82.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Valotto C., Falconieri G., Pizzolitto S. et al. Residual prostatic tumour in the surgical bed following radical prostatectomy in organconfined prostate cancer: possible prognostic significance. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2011; 83(2):78−82.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Rigatti P., Suardi N., Briganti A. et al. Pelvic/retroperitoneal salvage lymph node dissection for patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence and nodal recurrence detected by [11C] choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur Urol 2011;60(5): 935−43.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rigatti P., Suardi N., Briganti A. et al. Pelvic/retroperitoneal salvage lymph node dissection for patients treated with radical prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence and nodal recurrence detected by [11C] choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur Urol 2011;60(5): 935−43.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
