Cancer UrologyCancer UrologyОнкоурология1726-97761996-1812Publishing House ABV Press33710.17650/1726-9776-2012-8-3-80-87PROSTATE CANCERРАК ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER (A REVIEW OF LITERATURE)РОБОТ-АССИСТИРОВАННАЯ РАДИКАЛЬНАЯ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИЯ В ЛЕЧЕНИИ КЛИНИЧЕСКИ ЛОКАЛИЗОВАННОГО РАКА ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ (ОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ)NesterovS. N.НестеровС. Н.
Russian Federation
strat.alex.80@gmail.comStratA. A.СтратА. А.
Russian Federation
strat.alex.80@gmail.comN.I. Pirogov National Medical Surgical Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, MoscowФГБУ НМХЦ им. Н.И. Пирогова МЗ РФ, Москва300920128380870608201406082014https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/337

In the past 10 years, there have been drastic changes in the surgical approach to treating locally advanced prostate cancer; laparoscopic and substantially robot-assisted radical prostatectomies (RP) have become a preferred alternative to an open-access procedure. However, to what extent is the swift spread of a cost-effective method, such as robot-assisted RP, justified? The given review demonstrates the results of recent large-scale trials dealing with robot-assisted PRE and comparing open-access retropubic and robot-assisted RP procedures.

За минувшие 10 лет произошли значительные изменения в хирургическом подходе к лечению локализованного рака предстательной железы — лапароскопическая и в большей степени робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия (РПЭ) стали для многих пациентов предпочтительной альтернативой открытой методике. Однако насколько оправдано стремительное распространение такого дорогостоящего метода, как робот-ассистированная РПЭ? Представленный обзор демонстрирует результаты крупных исследований последних лет, посвященных робот-ассистированной простатэктомии, а также сравнению открытой позадилонной и робот-ассистированной методик РПЭ.

prostate cancerradical prostatectomyrobot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomyрак предстательной железырадикальная простатэктомияробот-ассистированная лапароскопическая простатэктомия1. Bill-Axelson A., Holmberg L., Filén F. et al. Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study Number 4. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100(16):1144−54.Bill-Axelson A., Holmberg L., Filén F. et al. Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study Number 4. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100(16):1144−54.2. Boorjian S.A., Karnes R.J., Viterbo R. Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Cancer 2011; 17(13):2883−91.Boorjian S.A., Karnes R.J., Viterbo R. Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Cancer 2011; 17(13):2883−91.3. Aus G. Current status of HIFU and cryotherapy in prostate cancer — a review. Eur Urol 2006;50(5):927−34.Aus G. Current status of HIFU and cryotherapy in prostate cancer — a review. Eur Urol 2006;50(5):927−34.4. Hu J.C., Wang Q., Pashos C.L. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostate ectomy. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26(14):2278−84.Hu J.C., Wang Q., Pashos C.L. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostate ectomy. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26(14):2278−84.5. Djavan B., Eckersberger E., Finkelstein J. et al. Oncologic, functional, and cost analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Suppl 2010; 9(3):371−8.Djavan B., Eckersberger E., Finkelstein J. et al. Oncologic, functional, and cost analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Suppl 2010; 9(3):371−8.6. Mottrie A., Ficarra V. Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy still be considered a new technology pushed by marketers? The IDEAL Evaluation. Eur Urol 2010;58(4):525−7.Mottrie A., Ficarra V. Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy still be considered a new technology pushed by marketers? The IDEAL Evaluation. Eur Urol 2010;58(4):525−7.7. Trinh Q.D., Sammon J., Sun M. et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 2012; 61(4):679−85.Trinh Q.D., Sammon J., Sun M. et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 2012; 61(4):679−85.8. Hu J.C., Gu X., Lipsitz S.R. et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009;302(14):1557−64.Hu J.C., Gu X., Lipsitz S.R. et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009;302(14):1557−64.9. Lepor H., Nieder A.M., Ferrandino M.N. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1000 cases. J Urol 2001;166(5):1729−33.Lepor H., Nieder A.M., Ferrandino M.N. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1000 cases. J Urol 2001;166(5):1729−33.10. Пушкарь Д.Ю., Раснер П.И. Диагностика и лечение локализованного рака предстательной железы. М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2008; с. 218.Пушкарь Д.Ю., Раснер П.И. Диагностика и лечение локализованного рака предстательной железы. М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2008; с. 218.11. Zincke H., Oesterling J.E., Blute M.L. et al. Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer. J Urol 1994; 152:1850−7.Zincke H., Oesterling J.E., Blute M.L. et al. Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer. J Urol 1994; 152:1850−7.12. Badani K.K., Kaul S., Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 2007;110(9):1951−8.Badani K.K., Kaul S., Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 2007;110(9):1951−8.13. Berryhill R. Jr, Jhaveri J., Yadav R. et al. Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 2008;72(1):15−23.Berryhill R. Jr, Jhaveri J., Yadav R. et al. Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 2008;72(1):15−23.14. Ficarra V., Novara G., Artibani W. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009;55(5):1037−63.Ficarra V., Novara G., Artibani W. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009;55(5):1037−63.15. Fracalanza S., Ficarra V., Cavalleri S. et al. Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 2008; 101(9):1145−9.Fracalanza S., Ficarra V., Cavalleri S. et al. Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 2008; 101(9):1145−9.16. Tewari A., Srivasatava A., Menon M. Members of the VIP team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robotassisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003;92(3):205−10.Tewari A., Srivasatava A., Menon M. Members of the VIP team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robotassisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003;92(3):205−10.17. Webster T.M., Herrell S.D., Chang S.S. et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. Urology 2005; 174(3):912−4.Webster T.M., Herrell S.D., Chang S.S. et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. Urology 2005; 174(3):912−4.18. Пушкарь Д.Ю., Раснер П.И., Колонтарев К.Б. Радикальная простатэктомия с роботической ассистенцией: анализ первых 80 случаев. Онкоурология 2010;3:37−42.Пушкарь Д.Ю., Раснер П.И., Колонтарев К.Б. Радикальная простатэктомия с роботической ассистенцией: анализ первых 80 случаев. Онкоурология 2010;3:37−42.19. Lasser M.S., Renzulli J., Turini G.A. et al. Anunbiased prospective report of perioperative ecomplications of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2010; 75(5):1083−9.Lasser M.S., Renzulli J., Turini G.A. et al. Anunbiased prospective report of perioperative ecomplications of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2010; 75(5):1083−9.20. Nelson B., Kaufman M., Broughton G. et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;177(3):929−31.Nelson B., Kaufman M., Broughton G. et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 2007;177(3):929−31.21. Di Pierro G.B., Baumeister P., Stucki P. et al. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol 2011;59(1):1−6.Di Pierro G.B., Baumeister P., Stucki P. et al. A prospective trial comparing consecutive series of open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a centre with a limited caseload. Eur Urol 2011;59(1):1−6.22. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240(2):205−13.Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240(2):205−13.23. Martin R.C. II, Brennan M.F., Jaques D.P. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 2002; 235(6):803−13.Martin R.C. II, Brennan M.F., Jaques D.P. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 2002; 235(6):803−13.24. Donat S.M. Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. Urology 2007;69(2):221−5.Donat S.M. Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. Urology 2007;69(2):221−5.25. Coelho R.F., Palmer K.J., Rocco B. et al. Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. Eur Urol 2010; 57(6):945−52.Coelho R.F., Palmer K.J., Rocco B. et al. Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. Eur Urol 2010; 57(6):945−52.26. Novara G., Ficarra V., D’Elia C. et al. Prospective evaluation with standardized criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57(3):363−70.Novara G., Ficarra V., D’Elia C. et al. Prospective evaluation with standardized criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57(3):363−70.27. Agarwal P.K., Sammon J., Bhandari A. et al. Safety profile of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a standardized report of complications in 3317 patients. Eur Urol 2011;59(5):684−98.Agarwal P.K., Sammon J., Bhandari A. et al. Safety profile of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a standardized report of complications in 3317 patients. Eur Urol 2011;59(5):684−98.28. Lowrance W.T., Elkin E.B., Jacks L.M. et al. Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. Urology 2010;183(4):1366−72.Lowrance W.T., Elkin E.B., Jacks L.M. et al. Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. Urology 2010;183(4):1366−72.29. Krambeck A.E., DiMarco D.S., Rangel L.J. et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robotassisted techniques. BJU Int 2009; 103(4):448−53.Krambeck A.E., DiMarco D.S., Rangel L.J. et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robotassisted techniques. BJU Int 2009; 103(4):448−53.30. Patel V.R., Palmer K.J., Coughlin G. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol 2008;22(10):2299−305.Patel V.R., Palmer K.J., Coughlin G. et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol 2008;22(10):2299−305.31. Murphy D.G., Kerger M., Crowe H. et al. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Urol 2009;55(6):1358−66.Murphy D.G., Kerger M., Crowe H. et al. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur Urol 2009;55(6):1358−66.32. Coelho R.F., Chauhan S., Orvieto M.A. et al. Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57(6):1022−9.Coelho R.F., Chauhan S., Orvieto M.A. et al. Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robotassisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57(6):1022−9.33. Atug F., Castle E.P., Srivastav S.K. et al. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2006; 49(5):866−72.Atug F., Castle E.P., Srivastav S.K. et al. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2006; 49(5):866−72.34. Barocas D.A., Salem S., Kordan Y. et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. Urology 2010; 183(3):990−6.Barocas D.A., Salem S., Kordan Y. et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. Urology 2010; 183(3):990−6.35. Schroeck F.R., Sun L., Freedland S.J. et al. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008; 102(1):28−32.Schroeck F.R., Sun L., Freedland S.J. et al. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008; 102(1):28−32.36. Ficarra V., Novara G., Fracalanza S. et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 2009; 104(4):534−9.Ficarra V., Novara G., Fracalanza S. et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 2009; 104(4):534−9.37. Williams S.B., Chen M.H., D’Amico A.V. et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s). Urology 2010;76(5):1097−101.Williams S.B., Chen M.H., D’Amico A.V. et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: likelihood of positive surgical margin(s). Urology 2010;76(5):1097−101.38. Menon M., Bhandari M., Gupta N. et al. Biochemical recurrence following robotassisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur Urol 2010;58(6):838−46.Menon M., Bhandari M., Gupta N. et al. Biochemical recurrence following robotassisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 1384 patients with a median 5-year follow-up. Eur Urol 2010;58(6):838−46.39. Eastham J.A., Scardino P.T., Kattan M.W. Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the trifecta nomogram. Urology 2008;179(6): 2207−11.Eastham J.A., Scardino P.T., Kattan M.W. Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the trifecta nomogram. Urology 2008;179(6): 2207−11.40. Menon M., Shrivastava A., Kaul S. et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;51(3):648−58.Menon M., Shrivastava A., Kaul S. et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;51(3):648−58.41. Coelho R.F., Rocco B., Patel M.B. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotassisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 2010;24(12):2003−15.Coelho R.F., Rocco B., Patel M.B. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotassisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 2010;24(12):2003−15.42. Joseph J.V., Rosenbaum R., Madeb R. et al. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. Urology 2006;175(3 Pt 1):945−50.Joseph J.V., Rosenbaum R., Madeb R. et al. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. Urology 2006;175(3 Pt 1):945−50.43. Mottrie A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases. Eur Urol 2007;52(3):746−50.Mottrie A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases. Eur Urol 2007;52(3):746−50.44. Patel V.R., Thaly R., Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int 2007;99(5):1109−12.Patel V.R., Thaly R., Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int 2007;99(5):1109−12.45. Joseph J.V., Leonhardt A., Hitendra R. et al. The cost of radical prostatectomy: retrospective comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted approaches. J Robotic Surg 2008;2(1):21−4.Joseph J.V., Leonhardt A., Hitendra R. et al. The cost of radical prostatectomy: retrospective comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted approaches. J Robotic Surg 2008;2(1):21−4.46. Joseph J.V., Leonhardt A., Erturk E. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: is this a cost-viable option? J Endourol 2005;19 (Suppl 1).Joseph J.V., Leonhardt A., Erturk E. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: is this a cost-viable option? J Endourol 2005;19 (Suppl 1).47. Patel H.R., Linares A., Joseph J.V. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery: cost and training. Surg Oncol 2009;18(3):242−6.Patel H.R., Linares A., Joseph J.V. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery: cost and training. Surg Oncol 2009;18(3):242−6.48. Burgess S.V., Atug F., Castle E.P. et al. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy. J Endourol 2006; 20(10):827−30.Burgess S.V., Atug F., Castle E.P. et al. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy. J Endourol 2006; 20(10):827−30.49. Hohwü L., Akre O., Pedersen K.V. et al. Open retropubic prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a comparison of length of sick leave. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2009;43(4):259−64.Hohwü L., Akre O., Pedersen K.V. et al. Open retropubic prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a comparison of length of sick leave. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2009;43(4):259−64.50. Lotan Y., Cadeddu J.A., Gettman M.T. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. Urology 2004; 172(4 Pt 1):1431−5.Lotan Y., Cadeddu J.A., Gettman M.T. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. Urology 2004; 172(4 Pt 1):1431−5.