Cancer UrologyCancer UrologyОнкоурология1726-97761996-1812Publishing House ABV Press14110.17650/1726-9776-2013-9-4-37-42PROSTATE CANCERРАК ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫMINI-INVASIVE TREATMENT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE AFTER PROSTATE CANCER RADICAL TREATMENTВОЗМОЖНОСТИ МАЛОИНВАЗИВНОЙ КОРРЕКЦИИ НЕДЕРЖАНИЯ МОЧИ ПОСЛЕ РАДИКАЛЬНОГО ЛЕЧЕНИЯ РАКА ПРЕДСТАТЕЛЬНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫVeliyevE. I.ВелиевЕ. И.
Russian Federation

Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology

кафедра урологии и хирургической андрологии

toandrei33@yandex.ruGolubtsovaE. N.ГолубцоваЕ. Н.
Russian Federation

Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology

кафедра урологии и хирургической андрологии

toandrei33@yandex.ruTomilovA. A.ТомиловА. А.
Russian Federation

Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology

кафедра урологии и хирургической андрологии

toandrei33@yandex.ruRussian Medical Academy Postgraduate Education, MoscowРМАПО301220139437422807201428072014https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/141

Objective: to evaluate transobturator retrobulbar sling (TRS) implantation midterm results for stress urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy.

Subjects and methods. From April 2008 to December 2012 thirteen TRS implantations were performed in Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology of Russian Medical Academy Postgraduate Education in men with mild to severe stress UI. Preoperative assessment, including urethrocystoscopy, was performed. The use of only one safety pad per day was considered to be recovery. The application of no more than 2 pads or a more than 50 % urine leakage reduction was regarded as improvement.

Results. An average follow-up of 33±19 months indicated recovery in 11 of the 13 patients, 1 patient had improvement, and 1 patient showed no positive result. In addition to urine loss reduction, there was significant quality of life improvement. No complications requiring sling removal were seen.

Conclusion. TRS implantation is an effective and safe treatment option for selected patients with stress UI after radical prostatectomy, leading to significantly quality of life improvement.

prostate cancerradical prostatectomyurinary incontinenceimplantationtransobturator retrobulbar slingrepositioning testpad testрак предстательной железырадикальная простатэктомиянедержание мочиимплантациятрансобтураторный ретробульбарный слингбульбарная пробапрокладочный тест1. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2011 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. В. И. Чиссова, В. В. Старинского, Г. В. Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена, 2013. 289 с.Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2011 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. В. И. Чиссова, В. В. Старинского, Г. В. Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена, 2013. 289 с.2. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2011 году. Под ред. В. И. Чиссова, В. В. Старинского, Г. В. Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена, 2012. 240 с.Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2011 году. Под ред. В. И. Чиссова, В. В. Старинского, Г. В. Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена, 2012. 240 с.3. Велиев Е. И., Петров С. Б. Практическая онкоурология: избранные лекции. Под ред. А. В. Воробьева, С. А. Тюляндина, В. М. Моисеенко. СПб.: Изд. Центр ТОММ, 2008. 368 с.Велиев Е. И., Петров С. Б. Практическая онкоурология: избранные лекции. Под ред. А. В. Воробьева, С. А. Тюляндина, В. М. Моисеенко. СПб.: Изд. Центр ТОММ, 2008. 368 с.4. Велиев Е. И., Голубцова Е. Н., Котов С. В. Особенности восстановления функции удержания мочи после нервосберегающей радикальной простатэктомии. Леч дело 2011;2:87–93.Велиев Е. И., Голубцова Е. Н., Котов С. В. Особенности восстановления функции удержания мочи после нервосберегающей радикальной простатэктомии. Леч дело 2011;2:87–93.5. Ficarra V., Novara G., Rosen R. C. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62 (3):405–17.Ficarra V., Novara G., Rosen R. C. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62 (3):405–17.6. Thuroff J. W., Abrams P., Andersson K. E. et al. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2011;59:387–400.Thuroff J. W., Abrams P., Andersson K. E. et al. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2011;59:387–400.7. Shipley W. U., Zietman A. L., Hanks G. E. et al. Treatment related sequelae following external beam radiation for prostate cancer: a review with an update in patients with stages T1 and T2 tumor. J Urol 1994;152(5):1799–805.Shipley W. U., Zietman A. L., Hanks G. E. et al. Treatment related sequelae following external beam radiation for prostate cancer: a review with an update in patients with stages T1 and T2 tumor. J Urol 1994;152(5):1799–805.8. Budäus L., Bolla M., Bossi A. et al. Functional outcomes and complications following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2012;61(1):112–27.Budäus L., Bolla M., Bossi A. et al. Functional outcomes and complications following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2012;61(1):112–27.9. Heidenreich A., Bellmunt J., Bolla M. et al. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer, 2012.Heidenreich A., Bellmunt J., Bolla M. et al. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer, 2012.10. De Ridder D., Rehder P. The AdVance male sling: anatomic features in relation to mode of action. Eur Urol Suppl 2011;10: 383–9.De Ridder D., Rehder P. The AdVance male sling: anatomic features in relation to mode of action. Eur Urol Suppl 2011;10: 383–9.11. Rehder P., Gozzi C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007;52 (3):860–7.Rehder P., Gozzi C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007;52 (3):860–7.12. Пошаговое иллюстрированное руководство по имплантации AMS Advance (Эдванс). Электронный ресурс: http://ams-ussia.ru/upload/pdf/articles/Advance/1advance_sbs. pdfПошаговое иллюстрированное руководство по имплантации AMS Advance (Эдванс). Электронный ресурс: http://ams-ussia.ru/upload/pdf/articles/Advance/1advance_sbs. pdf13. Engel R. M., Wade J. C. Experience with the Berry prosthesis. J Urol 1969;102:78–80.Engel R. M., Wade J. C. Experience with the Berry prosthesis. J Urol 1969;102:78–80.14. Kishev S. V. Surgery for male urinary incontinence. In: Urologic Surgery. 2nd ed. J. F. Glenn, ed. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott, 1975:596–611.Kishev S. V. Surgery for male urinary incontinence. In: Urologic Surgery. 2nd ed. J. F. Glenn, ed. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott, 1975:596–611.15. Kaufman J. J. A new operation for male incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970;131:295–9.Kaufman J. J. A new operation for male incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970;131:295–9.16. Carmel M., Hage B., Hanna S. et al. Longterm efficacy of the bone-anchored male sling for moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2010;106 (7):1012–6.Carmel M., Hage B., Hanna S. et al. Longterm efficacy of the bone-anchored male sling for moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2010;106 (7):1012–6.17. Guimarães M., Oliveira R., Pinto R. et al. Intermediate-term results, up to 4 years, of a bone-anchored male perineal sling for treating male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. BJU Int 2009;103(4):500–4.Guimarães M., Oliveira R., Pinto R. et al. Intermediate-term results, up to 4 years, of a bone-anchored male perineal sling for treating male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery. BJU Int 2009;103(4):500–4.18. Bochove-Overgaauw D. M., Schrier B. Ph. An adjustable sling for the treatment of all degrees of male stress urinary incontinence: retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications after a minimal followup of 14 months. J Urol 2011;185(4):1363–8.Bochove-Overgaauw D. M., Schrier B. Ph. An adjustable sling for the treatment of all degrees of male stress urinary incontinence: retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications after a minimal followup of 14 months. J Urol 2011;185(4):1363–8.19. Sousa-Escandón A., Cabrera J., Mantovani F. et al. Adjustable suburethral sling (male remeex system) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol 2007;52(5):1473–80.Sousa-Escandón A., Cabrera J., Mantovani F. et al. Adjustable suburethral sling (male remeex system) in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a multicentric European study. Eur Urol 2007;52(5):1473–80.20. Rehder P., Freiin von Gleissenthall G., Pichler R., Glodny B. The treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence with the retroluminal transobturator repositioning sling (Advance): lessons learned from accumulative experience. Arch Esp Urol 2009;62:860–70.Rehder P., Freiin von Gleissenthall G., Pichler R., Glodny B. The treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence with the retroluminal transobturator repositioning sling (Advance): lessons learned from accumulative experience. Arch Esp Urol 2009;62:860–70.