Cancer UrologyCancer UrologyОнкоурология1726-97761996-1812Publishing House ABV Press126910.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-2-144-151REVIEWОБЗОРRisk factors and methods for prevention of lymphogenic complications in oncourological operations in pelvic area (systematic review)Факторы риска и методы профилактики лимфогенных осложнений при онкоурологических операциях на органах малого таза (систематический обзор)https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3764-6131KotovS. V.КотовС. В.
Russian Federation

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997; 8 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119049

117997Москва, ул. Островитянова, 1; 119049 Москва, Ленинский проспект, 8

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8073-2708ProstomolotovA. O.ПростомолотовА. О.
Russian Federation

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997; 8 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119049

Артём Олегович Простомолотов - аспирант кафедры урологии и андрологии ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова.

117997Москва, ул. Островитянова, 1; 119049 Москва, Ленинский проспект, 8

artem.prostomolotov@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2944-2668GuspanovR. I.ГуспановР. И.
Russian Federation

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997; 8 Leninskiy Prospekt, Moscow 119049

117997Москва, ул. Островитянова, 1; 119049 Москва, Ленинский проспект, 8

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6322-7868ZhilovM. S.ЖиловМ. С.
Russian Federation

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997

117997Москва, ул. Островитянова, 1

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaФГАОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет им. Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава РоссииN.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital No. 1, Moscow Healthcare DepartmentГБУЗ г. Москвы Городская клиническая больница № 1 им. Н.И. Пирогова Департамента здравоохранения г. Москвы300620201621441511603202026052020https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1269

Radical prostatectomy and cystectomy with pelvic lymphatic dissection are the most common operations in oncourology. Development of lymphatic complications, such as lymphocele, lymphorrhea and lymphedema, often complicates their implementation. However, not all lymphatic complications manifest themselves clinically and require surgical treatment. There are many risk factors and methods for preventing lymphogenic complications during oncourological operations in the pelvic area. In this article, we will review potential provocative factors that should be considered when performing oncourological interventions in the pelvis, as well as methods for their prevention, which can minimize the lymphogenic complications.

Радикальная простатэктомия и цистэктомия с тазовой лимфодиссекцией являются наиболее распространенными операциями в онкоурологии, и развитие лимфатических осложнений, таких как лимфоцеле, лимфорея и лимфедема, часто осложняет их выполнение. Однако не все лимфатические осложнения проявляются клинически и требуют хирургического вмешательства. Существует множество факторов риска и методов профилактики лимфогенных осложнений при онкоурологических операциях на органах малого таза. В настоящем обзоре рассмотрены потенциально провоцирующие факторы, которые следует учитывать при проведении онкоурологических вмешательств в малом тазу, а также методы их профилактики, позволяющие свести к минимуму образование лимфогенных осложнений.

lymphocelelymphorrhearadical prostatectomyradical cystectomypelvic lymphatic dissectionлимфоцеле, лимфорея, радикальная простатэктомия, радикальная цистэктомия, тазовая лимфодиссекцияNovara G., Ficarra V., Rosen R.C. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62(3):431—52. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044.Yuh B., Artibani W., Heidenreich A. et al. The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2014;65(5):918—27. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.026.Ploussard G., Briganti A., de la Taille A. et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications — a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2014;65(1):7—16. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057.Patel V.R., Sivaraman A. Current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: progress is inevitable. Oncology (Wlliston Park, NY) 2012;26(7):616—9, 622.Khoder W.Y., Trottmann M., Buchner A. et al. Risk factors for pelvic lymphoceles post-radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2011;18(9):638—43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02797.x.Novotny V., Hakenberg O.W., Wiessner D. et al. Perioperative complications of radical cystectomy in a contemporary series. Eur Urol 2007;51(2):397—401; discussion 401—2. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.014.Mori N. Clinical and experimental studies on the so-called lymphocyst which develops after radical hysterectomy in cancer of the uterine cervix. J Jpn Obstet Gynecol Soc 1955;2(2):178—203.White M., Mueller P.R., Ferrucci J.T. et al. Percutaneous drainage of postoperative abdominal and pelvic lymphoceles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;145(5):1065—9. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.145.5.1065.Rogovskaya T.T., Berlev I.V Lymphatic cysts after gynecological cancer surgery: risk factors, diagnosis and treatment. Opukholi zhenskoy reproduktivnoy systemy = Tumors of Female Reproductive System 2018;14(4):72—9. (In Russ.).Роговская Т.Т., Берлев И.В. Лимфатические кисты после хирургического лечения онкогинекологических больных: факторы риска, диагностика и лечение. Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы 2018;14(4):72-9. DOI: 10.17650/1994-4098-2018-14-4-72-79.Tomic R., Granfors T., Sjodin J.G., Ohberg L. Lymph leakage after staging pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostatic carcinoma with and without heparin prophylaxis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1994;28(3):273—5. DOI: 10.3109/00365599409181277.Orvieto M.A., Coelho R.F., Chauhan S. et al. Incidence of lymphoceles after robot-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection. BJU Int 2011;108(7):1185—90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10094.x.Kropfl D., Krause R., Hartung R. et al. Subcutaneous heparin injection in the upper arm as a method of avoiding lympho-celes after lymphadenectomies in the lower part of the body. Urol Int 1987;42(6):416—23. DOI: 10.1159/000282006.Sieber P.R., Rommel F.M., Agusta V.E. et al. Is heparin contraindicated in pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy? J Urol 1997;158(3 Pt 1):869-71. DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199709000-00050.Chalmers D.J., Scarpato K.R., Staff I. et al. Does heparin prophylaxis reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy? J Endourol 2013;27(6):800—3. DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0532.Porpiglia F., Terrone C., Tarabuzzi R. et al. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single center. Urology 2006;68(2):376-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.039.Chung J.S., Kim W.T., Ham W.S. et al. Comparison of oncological results, functional outcomes, and complications for transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon’s experience. J Endourol 2011;25(5):787—92. DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0222.Mihaljevic A.L., Heger P., Dezfouli S. et al. Prophylaxis of lymphocele formation after kidney transplantation via peritoneal fenestration: a systematic review. Transpl Int 2017;30(6):543—55. DOI: 10.1111/tri.12952.Horovitz D., Lu X., Feng C. et al. Rate of symptomatic lymphocele formation after extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. J Endourol 2017;31(10):1037—43. DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0153.Froehner M., Novotny V., Koch R. et al. Perioperative complications after radical prostatectomy: open versus robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Urol Int 2013;90:312-5. DOI: 10.1159/000345323.Zorn K.C., Katz M.H., Bernstein A. et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: assessing nodal yield, perioperative outcomes, and complications. Urology 2009;74:296-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.01.077.Jentzmik F., Schostak M., Stephan C. et al. Extraperitoneal radical cystectomy with extraperitonealization of the ileal neobladder: a comparison to the transperitoneal technique. World J Urol 2010;28(4):457-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-009-0476-z.Mottet N., Bellmunt J., Bolla M. et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2017;71(4):618—29. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003.Capitanio U., Pellucchi F., Gallina A. et al. How can we predict lymphorrhoea and clinically significant lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy? Clinical implications. BJU Int 2011;107(7):1095—101. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09580.x.Yuh B.E., Ruel N.H., Mejia R. et al. Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphaden-ectomy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2013;112(1):81—8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11788.x.Weingartner K., Ramaswamy A., Bittinger A. et al. Anatomical basis for pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer: results of an autopsy study and implications for the clinic. J Urol 1996;156(6):1969—71. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65406-5.Bochner B.H., Cho D., Herr H.W. et al. Prospectively packaged lymph node dissections with radical cystectomy: evaluation of node count variability and node mapping. J Urol 2004;172(4 Pt 1):1286—90. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000137817.56888.d1.Lee J.Y., Diaz R.R., Cho K.S. et al. Lymphocele after Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score-matching study. Int J Urol 2013;20(12):1169—76. DOI: 10.1111/iju.12144.Danuser H., Di Pierro G.B., Stucki P. et al. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy and various radical prostatectomy techniques: is pelvic drainage necessary? BJU Int 2013;111(6):963—9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11681.x.Box G.N., Lee H.J., Abraham J.B. et al. Comparative study of in vivo lymphatic sealing capability of the porcine thoracic duct using laparoscopic dissection devices. J Urol 2009;181(1):387—91. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.122.Grande P., Di Pierro G.B., Mordasini L. et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing titanium clips to bipolar coagulation in sealing lymphatic vessels during pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2017;71(2):155—8. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.006.Simonato A., Varca V., Esposito M. et al. The use of a surgical patch in the prevention of lymphoceles after extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: a randomized prospective pilot study. J Urol 20)09;182(5):22.85—90. DOI: 10.1016/jjuro.2009.07.033.Gotto G.T., Yunis L.H., Guillonneau B. et al. Predictors of symptomatic lympho-cele after radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Int J Urol 2011;18(4):291—6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02710.x.Chenam A., Yuh B., Zhumkhawala A. et al. Prospective randomised non-inferiority trial of pelvic drain placement vs no pelvic drain placement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2018;121(3):357—64. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14010.Stolzenburg J.U., Wasserscheid J., Rabenalt R. et al. Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration. World J Urol 2008;26(6):581—6. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0327-3.Nyushko K.M., Krasheninnikov A.A., Temirgereev M.Z. et al. Method of prevention of lymphorrhea and lymphocyst in patients with prostate cancer after surgical treatment. Invention RU 2674976 C2, 13.12.2018. Application No 2018111102 of 28.03.2018. (In Russ.).Нюшко К.М., Крашенинников А.А., Темиргереев М.З. и др. Способ профилактики лимфореи и лимфокист у больных раком предстательной железы после хирургического лечения. Патент на изобретение RU 2674976 C2, 13.12.2018. Заявка № 2018111102 от 28.03.2018.Lebeis C., Canes D., Sorcini A. et al. Novel technique prevents lymphoceles after transperitoneal robotic-assisted pelvic lymph node dissection: peritoneal flap interposition. Urol 2015;85(6):1505—9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.034.Dal Moro F., Zattoni F. P.L.E.A.T. - Preventing lymphocele ensuring absorption transperitoneally: a robotic technique. Urol 2017;110:244-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.05.031.Stolzenburg J.U., Arthanareeswaran V.KA., Dietel A. et al. Four-point peritoneal flap fixation in preventing lymphocele formation following radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol 2018;1(5):443—8. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.004.Temirgereev M.Z., Nyushko K.M., Suleimanov E.A. et al. Early and late postoperative complications of radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Onkologiya. Zhurnal im. P.A. Gertsena = P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology 2020;9(1):66—71. (In Russ.).Темиргереев М.З., Нюшко К.М., Сулейманов Э.А., Товгереева М.Я. Ранние и поздние послеоперационные осложнения радикальной простатэкто-мии с расширенной тазовой лимфаденэктомией. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2020;9(1):66—71. DOI: 10.17116/onkolog2020901166.Frantsev D.Yu. Postoperative lymphatic pelvic cysts: analytical review. Klinicheskaya i eksperimental’naya khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. аkad. B.V. Petrov-skogo = Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Petrovsky Journal 2015;4:113-20. (In Russ.).Францев Д.Ю. Послеоперационные лимфатические кисты таза: аналитический обзор. Клиническая и экспериментальная хирургия. Журнал им. акад. Б.В. Петровского. 2015;4:113-20.