<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Cancer Urology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Cancer Urology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Онкоурология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1726-9776</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1996-1812</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1112</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1726-9776-2007-3-3-10-15</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM TUMORS. RENAL CANCER</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ДИАГНОСТИКА И ЛЕЧЕНИЕ ОПУХОЛЕЙ МОЧЕПОЛОВОЙ СИСТЕМЫ. Рак почки</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Comparative analysis of the results of laparoscopic and open nephrectomies in renal parenchymal tumors</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Сравнительный анализ результатов лапароскопической и открытой нефрэктомии при опухолях почечной паренхимы</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Romashchenko</surname><given-names>N. N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ромащенко</surname><given-names>Н. Н.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Unit of Urology</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Отделение урологии</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Matveyev</surname><given-names>V. B.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Матвеев</surname><given-names>В. Б.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of Urology</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Отделение урологии</p><p>Москва</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Volkova</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Волкова</surname><given-names>М. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of Urology</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Отделение урологии</p><p>Москва</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Komarov</surname><given-names>I. G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Комаров</surname><given-names>И. Г.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Department of Urology</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Отделение урологии</p><p>Москва</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Bryansk Municipal Hospital Two</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">МУЗ Брянская городская больница №2</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">РОНЦ им.Н.Н.Блохина РАМН</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2007-09-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2007</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>10</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-02-15"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2020</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-02-15"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1112">https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1112</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Objective.</bold> To compare the immediate and long-term results of laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomies in renal parenchymal tumors.</p><p><bold>Subjects and methods.</bold> The study covered 195 patients who underwent nephrectomy in 1986 to 2006. Their median age was 54,1 years; male/female ratio was 1,5:1. All the patients were divided into 2 groups. A study group comprised 102 (52,3%) patients with renal tumors, including 93 (91,2%) with renal-cell carcinoma (pT1-3N0-1M0-1) and 9 (8,8%) with benign tumors, who had undergone laparoscopic nephrectomy. Ninety-three (47,7%) patients who had undergone open radical nephrectomy for localized renal cancer were retrospectively selected for a control group. The median follow-up in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups were 19,6±13,2 and 62,3±35,9 months, respectively.</p><p><bold>Results.</bold> The median time of laparoscopic nephrectomy was significantly more than that of open surgery (170 and 100 min, respectively; p &lt; 0,001). The median blood loss volume did not differ in the groups (280,1 and 283,5 ml, respectively; p = 0,342). In the study and control groups, the frequency of intraoperative complications was 10,9 and 4,3% (p = 0,075) and that of postoperative ones was 10,8 and 7,5%, respectively (p &gt; 0,05). In 8 (7,9%) cases, conversion was required to suture defects of large vessels. In the laparoscopic group, the median length of stay was significantly less than that in the control group (7,0±3,6 and 12,0±3,1 days, respectively; p &lt; 0,001). The differences were insignificant in the average cost of endoscopic and open surgeries. Questionnaire survey revealed a significant improvement in the quality of life after surgery via laparoscopic access. Relapses were detected in 2 (2,2%) patients from the study group: a local recurrence in 1 (1,1%) patient and metastases in 1 (1,1%); and in 5 (5,4%) control patients: metastases in 4 (4,3%), local relapse and distant metastases in 1 (1,1%; p = 0,271). In renal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic and open nephrectomies, overall, specific, and relapse-free 4-year survival rates were 100; 100, and 94,9% and 96,4, 97,5, and 96,2%, respectively (p &gt; 0,05).</p><p><bold>Conclusion.</bold> Laparoscopic nephrectomy is the method of choice in treating renal cancer — pT1—3aN0M0, which yields the same long-term results as open surgery and provides a better quality of life.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>.</p></trans-abstract><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Portis A.J., Yan Y., Landman J. et al. Long-term follow0up after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2002;167:1257—62.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Portis A.J., Yan Y., Landman J. et al. Long-term follow0up after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2002;167:1257—62.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Chan D.Y., Cadeddu J.A., Jarrer T.W. et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: cancer control for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001;166:2095—100.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chan D.Y., Cadeddu J.A., Jarrer T.W. et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: cancer control for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001;166:2095—100.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Saika T., Ono Y., Hattori R. et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2003;62:1018—23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Saika T., Ono Y., Hattori R. et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for pathologic T1 renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2003;62:1018—23.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Dunn M.D., Portis A.J., Shalhav A.L. et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 2000;164:1153—9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dunn M.D., Portis A.J., Shalhav A.L. et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 2000;164:1153—9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. Siquera T.M., Kuo R.L., Gardner T.A. et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J Urol 2002;168:1361—5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Siquera T.M., Kuo R.L., Gardner T.A. et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J Urol 2002;168:1361—5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Gill I.S., Kavoussi L.R., Clayman R.F.V. et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multiinstitutional review. J Urol 1995;154:479—83.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gill I.S., Kavoussi L.R., Clayman R.F.V. et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multiinstitutional review. J Urol 1995;154:479—83.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Holzheimer R.G.Laparoscopic procedures as a risk factor of deep venous thrombosis, superficial ascending thrombophlebitis and pulmonary embolism-case report and review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 2004;29:417—22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Holzheimer R.G.Laparoscopic procedures as a risk factor of deep venous thrombosis, superficial ascending thrombophlebitis and pulmonary embolism-case report and review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 2004;29:417—22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Catheline J.M., Capelluto E., Gaillard J.L. Thromboembolism prophylaxis and incidence of thromboembolic complications after laparoscopic surgery. Int J Surg Investig 2000;2(1):41—7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Catheline J.M., Capelluto E., Gaillard J.L. Thromboembolism prophylaxis and incidence of thromboembolic complications after laparoscopic surgery. Int J Surg Investig 2000;2(1):41—7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Kim I.Y., Clayman R.V. Laoparoscopic radical nephrectomy. In: Genitourinary Oncology. 3rd ed. N.J. Vogelzang, P.T. Scarding, W.U. Shipley, D.S. Coffey (eds). USA, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. p. 731—9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim I.Y., Clayman R.V. Laoparoscopic radical nephrectomy. In: Genitourinary Oncology. 3rd ed. N.J. Vogelzang, P.T. Scarding, W.U. Shipley, D.S. Coffey (eds). USA, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. p. 731—9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. Tsui K.-H., Svarts O., Smith R.B. et al. Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analisys of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol 2000;163:1090—5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsui K.-H., Svarts O., Smith R.B. et al. Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analisys of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol 2000;163:1090—5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Javidan J., Stricker H.J., Tamboli P. et al. Prognostic significance of 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1999;162:1277—81.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Javidan J., Stricker H.J., Tamboli P. et al. Prognostic significance of 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1999;162:1277—81.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
