<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Cancer Urology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Cancer Urology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Онкоурология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1726-9776</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1996-1812</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1026</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1726-9776-2008-4-4-30-32</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM TUMORS. PROSTATE CANCER</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ДИАГНОСТИКА И ЛЕЧЕНИЕ ОПУХОЛЕЙ МОЧЕПОЛОВОЙ СИСТЕМЫ. Рак предстательной железы</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Repeat transrectal prostate biopsy in patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: optimal time and technique</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Повторная трансректальная биопсия предстательной железы у пациентов с простатической интраэпителиальной неоплазией высокой степени: сроки и особенности проведения</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kurdzhiev</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Курджиев</surname><given-names>М. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Urology Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Кафедра урологии</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Govorov</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Говоров</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Urology Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Кафедра урологии</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pushkar</surname><given-names>D. Y.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пушкарь</surname><given-names>Д. Ю.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Urology Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Кафедра урологии</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kovylina</surname><given-names>M. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ковылина</surname><given-names>М. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Urology Department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Кафедра урологии</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">МГМСУ</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2008-12-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>12</month><year>2008</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>30</fpage><lpage>32</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-02-13"><day>13</day><month>02</month><year>2020</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-02-13"><day>13</day><month>02</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1026">https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1026</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Purpose.</bold> The aim of our study was to define optimal time and technique of repeat transrectal prostate biopsy in patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.</p><p><bold>Materials and Methods.</bold> A total of 277 men with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia regardless of changes in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) or digital rectal examination findings underwent follow up biopsy in 8 months (range 1—12 months) after diagnosis. All men had at least 12 (12—18) biopsy cores taken at the time of diagnosis.</p><p><bold>Results.</bold> Prostate cancer was found in 29,2% cases (81 of 277 patiens) after the second biopsy and in 2,9 % (1 of 35) cases after the third biopsy. The highest detection rate was found using 14 and 16 core biopsy schemes 12 and 6 months after the first biopsy.</p><p><bold>Conclusions.</bold> Our findings support the concept that high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a precursor to prostate cancer and that repeat biopsy at a delayed interval is recommended regardless of changes in PSA.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>.</p></trans-abstract><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Ayala A.G., Naya Y., Tamboli P. et al. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and invasive adenocarcinoma: case repot and pre-liminary study of 103 patients with high-grade PIN. Pathol Case Rev 2003;8:61—7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ayala A.G., Naya Y., Tamboli P. et al. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and invasive adenocarcinoma: case repot and pre-liminary study of 103 patients with high-grade PIN. Pathol Case Rev 2003;8:61—7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Bishara T., Rammani D.M., Epstein J.I. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:629—33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bishara T., Rammani D.M., Epstein J.I. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:629—33.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Bostwick D.G. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol 2004;17:360—79.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bostwick D.G. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol 2004;17:360—79.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Bostwick D.G. Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PIN). Urology 1989;34:16—22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bostwick D.G. Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PIN). Urology 1989;34:16—22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. McNeal J.E., Bostwick D.G. Intraductal dysplasia: A premalignant lesion of the prostate. Hum Pathol 1986;17:64—71.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McNeal J.E., Bostwick D.G. Intraductal dysplasia: A premalignant lesion of the prostate. Hum Pathol 1986;17:64—71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Epstein J.I., Grignon D.J., Humphrey P. et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19:873—6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Epstein J.I., Grignon D.J., Humphrey P. et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19:873—6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Orozco R., O'Dowd G.J., Kunnel B. et al. Observations on pathology trends in 62,537 prostate biopsies obtained from urology private practices in the United States. Urology 1998;51:186—95.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Orozco R., O'Dowd G.J., Kunnel B. et al. Observations on pathology trends in 62,537 prostate biopsies obtained from urology private practices in the United States. Urology 1998;51:186—95.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Steiner M.S. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer risk reduction. World J Urol 2003;21:15—20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Steiner M.S. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer risk reduction. World J Urol 2003;21:15—20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Davidson D., Bostwick D.G., Qian J. et al. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a risk factor for adenocarcinoma: predictive accuracy in needle biopsies. J Urol 1995;154:1295—9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Davidson D., Bostwick D.G., Qian J. et al. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a risk factor for adenocarcinoma: predictive accuracy in needle biopsies. J Urol 1995;154:1295—9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. Girasole C.R., Cookson M.S., Putzi M.J. et al. Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations, and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy. J Urol 2006;175(3):929—33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Girasole C.R., Cookson M.S., Putzi M.J. et al. Significance of atypical and suspicious small acinar proliferations, and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy: implications for cancer detection and biopsy strategy. J Urol 2006;175(3):929—33.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Joniau S., Goeman L., Pennings J., Van Poppel H. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): importance and clinical management. Eur Urol 2005;48(3):379—85.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Joniau S., Goeman L., Pennings J., Van Poppel H. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): importance and clinical management. Eur Urol 2005;48(3):379—85.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12. O`Dowd G.J., Miller G., Orozco R., Veltri R.W. Analysis of repeated biopsy result within 1 year after a noncancer diagnosis. Urology 2000;55(4):553—9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O`Dowd G.J., Miller G., Orozco R., Veltri R.W. Analysis of repeated biopsy result within 1 year after a noncancer diagnosis. Urology 2000;55(4):553—9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13. Epstein J.I., Herawi M. Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol 2006;175(3):820—34.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Epstein J.I., Herawi M. Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol 2006;175(3):820—34.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14. Herawi M., Kahane H., Cavallo C., Epstein J.I. Risk of prostate cancer on first re-biopsy within 1 year following a diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is related to the number of cores sampled. J Urol 2006;175(1):121—4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herawi M., Kahane H., Cavallo C., Epstein J.I. Risk of prostate cancer on first re-biopsy within 1 year following a diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is related to the number of cores sampled. J Urol 2006;175(1):121—4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15. Moore C.K., Karikehallis S., Nazeer T. et al. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era. J Urol 2005;173(1):70—2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moore C.K., Karikehallis S., Nazeer T. et al. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era. J Urol 2005;173(1):70—2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16. Lefkowitz G.K., Taneja S.S., Brown J. et al. Followup interval prostate biopsy 3 years after diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with high likelihood of prostate cancer, independent of change in prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol 2002;168(4):1415—8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lefkowitz G.K., Taneja S.S., Brown J. et al. Followup interval prostate biopsy 3 years after diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with high likelihood of prostate cancer, independent of change in prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol 2002;168(4):1415—8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">17. Ковылина М.В. Клиникоморфологическая характеристика предраковых заболеваний и рака предстательной железы. Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. М.; 2006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ковылина М.В. Клиникоморфологическая характеристика предраковых заболеваний и рака предстательной железы. Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. М.; 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">18. McNeal J.E., Villers A., Redwine E.A. et al. Microcarcinoma of the prostate: its association with duct-acinar dysplasia. Hum Pathol 1991;22:644.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McNeal J.E., Villers A., Redwine E.A. et al. Microcarcinoma of the prostate: its association with duct-acinar dysplasia. Hum Pathol 1991;22:644.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">19. Srodom M., Epstein J.I. Central zone histology of the prostate: a mimicker of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Hum Pathol 2002;33:518—23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Srodom M., Epstein J.I. Central zone histology of the prostate: a mimicker of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Hum Pathol 2002;33:518—23.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
