Persistent prostate-specific antigen levels after radical prostatectomy as a prognostic marker and a guide for early treatment in the era of PSMA-based diagnostics
- Authors: Izmailov A.A.1,2, Vorobev V.A.1,3, Garifullin A.I.2, Chaprak A.B.2, Khaziev A.R.2, Farganov A.R.2, Akchulpan T.K.2, Khrizman Y.N.2
-
Affiliations:
- Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
- Irkutsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: Vol 22, No 2 (2026)
- Pages: 54-65
- Section: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM TUMORS. PROSTATE CANCER
- Published: 29.09.2026
- URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/2004
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2026-22-2-54-65
- ID: 2004
Cite item
Abstract
Aim. To assess the frequency, risk factors, and prognostic value of persistent prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels 3 months after radical prostatectomy (RP), and to evaluate the role of positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography, with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-PET/CT) and early treatment strategies in patients with PSA persistence.
Materials and methods. A retrospective study of 837 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RP between 2019 and 2024. PSA persistence was defined as a level ≥0.1 ng/mL at 3 months postoperatively. Clinicopathological features, biochemical and metastatic outcomes were analyzed. Predictive models using logistic regression and machine learning algorithms (MLP, Random Forest) were developed. ROC curve analysis (AUC) and Kaplan–Meier survival curves were used to assess predictive accuracy and metastasis-free survival.
Results. PSA persistence was observed in 285 patients (34.0 %). It was significantly associated with high-grade disease (ISUP ≥3 (ISUP – International Society of Urological Pathology); hazard ratio 2.10; p = 0.001) and advanced pathological stage pT3–T4 (p = 0.039), but not with positive surgical margins (p = 0.92). Predictive models showed moderate accuracy (AUC 0.59–0.60), with preoperative PSA being the most important feature (>40 % contribution in Random Forest). Three-year metastasis-free survival was 98.5 % in the persistence group vs 99.7 % in the non-persistence group (p >0.3). PSMA PET/CT identified residual disease in 68 % of persistent PSA cases and influenced treatment decisions.
Conclusion. Persistent PSA at 3 months post-RP is a common and clinically relevant marker, strongly associated with aggressive disease. Early detection using PSMA PET/CT and risk-adapted salvage treatment improve disease control and metastasis-free outcomes.
About the authors
A. A. Izmailov
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: denecer@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8461-9243
Russian Federation, 3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008; 73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
Vladimir A. Vorobev
Bashkir State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; Irkutsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: denecer@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3285-5559
Russian Federation, 3 Lenina St., Ufa 450008; 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya St., Irkutsk 664003
A. I. Garifullin
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: denecer@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7616-3899
Russian Federation, 73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
A. B. Chaprak
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: denecer@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-3906-6521
Russian Federation, 73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
A. R. Khaziev
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: denecer@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9142-480X
Russian Federation, 73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
A. R. Farganov
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: denecer@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-4019-9602
Russian Federation, 73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
T. Kh. Akchulpan
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: denecer@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3627-0067
Russian Federation, 73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
Yu. N. Khrizman
Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: denecer@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-5825-7484
Russian Federation, 73/1 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450054
References
- Kimura S., Urabe F., Sasaki H. et al. Prognostic significance of prostate-specific antigen persistence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:948. doi: 10.3390/cancers13050948
- Cornford P., van den Bergh R.C.N., Briers E. et al. EAU–EANM–ESTRO–ESUR–ISUP–SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer – 2024 update. Part I: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 2024;86:148–63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027
- Ploussard G., Fossati N., Wiegel T. et al. Management of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol Oncol 2021;4(2):150–69. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.001
- Von Stauffenberg F., Poyet C., Beintner-Skawran S. et al. Current clinical applications of ПСМА-PET for prostate cancer diagnosis, staging, and treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2024;16:4263. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244263
- Gillessen S., Turco F., Davis I.D. et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Report from the 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC). Eur Urol 2025;87:157–216. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.017
- Lee D.B., Kim J.Y., Song W.H. et al. The impact of the percent of residual prostate-specific antigen on metastasis-free survival in patients with persistent prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy. World J Men Health 2023;41:227–35. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.220066
- Tilki D., Chen M.H., Wu J. et al. Persistent prostate-specific antigen following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and mortality risk. JAMA Oncol 2025;11:502–10. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0110
- Ahlberg M.S., Garmo H., Adami H.O. et al. Time without PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of future biochemical recurrence, metastatic disease and prostate cancer death: a prospective Scandinavian cohort study. BMJ Open 2022;12:e057242. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057242
- Hao S., Wang H., Lin S. et al. Analysis of risk factors for persistent PSA after radical prostatectomy: results from a high-volume center in Southeast China. BMC Urology 2024;24:185. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01563-z
- Morgan T.M., Boorjian S.A., Buyyounouski M.K. et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Part I: introduction and treatment decision-making at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2024;211(4):509–17. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003892
- Farolfi A., Gafita A., Calais J. et al. 68Ga-ПСМА-11 positron emission tomography detects residual prostate cancer after prostatectomy in a multicenter retrospective study. J Urol 2019;202:1174–81. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000417
- Habl G., Sauter K., Schiller K. et al. 68Ga-ПСМА-PET for radiation treatment planning in prostate cancer recurrences after surgery: individualized medicine or new standard in salvage treatment. Prostate 2017;77:920–7. doi: 10.1002/pros.23347
- Preisser F., Incesu R.B., Rajwa P. et al. Impact of persistent PSA after salvage radical prostatectomy: a multicenter study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024;27:686–92. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00728-5
- Gillessen S., Bossi A., Davis I.D. et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Part I: intermediate-/high-risk and locally advanced disease, biochemical relapse, and side effects of hormonal treatment: report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022. Eur Urol 2023;83:267–93. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.002
- Scilipoti P., Garmo H., Gedeborg R. et al. Incidence and prognostic implications of prostate-specific antigen persistence and relapse after radical prostatectomy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2025;117:1142–50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf012
- Thomas S., Callahan J., Conway P. et al. High detection rates for prostate-specific membrane antigen – avid prostate cancer recurrence at low prostate-specific antigen levels on extended axial field-of-view PET/CT. Eur Urol Open Sci 2024;71:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.11.008
- Gillessen S., Bossi A., Davis I.D. et al. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer – metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer: report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022. Eur J Cancer 2023;185:178–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.018
- Preisser F., Chun F.K.H., Pompe R.S. et al. Persistent prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy and its impact on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2019;76:106–14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.048
- Bossi A., Foulon S., Maldonado X. et al. Efficacy and safety of prostate radiotherapy in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2×2 factorial design. Lancet 2024;404:2065–76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01865-8
- Carlsson S. A randomized trial comparing conventional salvage radiotherapy and individualized 68Ga-ПСМА-11 or 18F-ПСМА-1007 PET/CT-targeted treatment in patients with biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov; 2025.
Supplementary files

