Immunological markers as predictors of locally advanced disease and biochemical recurrence in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Systemic inflammation is considered as a significant factor in the pathogenesis and progression of prostate cancer. Despite the leading role of standard clinical and laboratory parameters in assessing the aggressiveness of the disease, literature data demonstrate potential prognostic value of immunological markers, however, their significance in intermediate risk group remains insufficiently studied.

Aim. To evaluate the association of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte (LMR) ratios and the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) with oncological outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the treatment results of 167 patients with morphologically confirmed intermediate risk prostate cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 2019–2023 was performed. The association of preoperative immunological markers with pathomorphological characteristics, stage of the disease after surgery, frequency of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and recurrence-free survival was evaluated. Mann–Whitney tests, Pearson’s χ2, ROC analysis, Kaplan–Mayer analysis, and Cox regression were used to identify associations and assess the predictive significance of markers.

Results. With a median follow-up of 32.7 months, the incidence of BCR was 10.8 % of cases. Neither NLR nor LMR demonstrated a statistically significant association with aggressive pathomorphological features or BCR. However, patients with a locally advanced process had lower SII values (p = 0.0437). Patients with BCR also had lower median SII (p = 0.0108) and PLR (p = 0.0346). Using ROC analysis, threshold levels were determined: PLR <98.2 and SII <360.6. Patients with SII <360.6 had a higher risk of BCR, confirmed by multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 5.7; p = 0.0342). At the same time, the PLR did not demonstrate a prognostic value in relation to BCR.

Conclusion. NLR and LMR have no prognostic value in relation to aggressive forms of the disease and BCR in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. SII and PLR demonstrate an association with a locally advanced disease and the likelihood of BCR, with SII remaining an independent predictor. Nevertheless, the variability of threshold values according to literature data and the presence of cofactors limit their clinical use, which underlines the need for further prospective studies.

About the authors

S. B. Petrov

I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: av-arnautov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3460-3427
Russian Federation, 6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022

Aleksandr V. Arnautov

I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: av-arnautov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3550-0067
Russian Federation, 6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022

K. A. Arnautova

I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: av-arnautov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-9123-2113
Russian Federation, 6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022

S. A. Reva

I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: av-arnautov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5183-5153
Russian Federation, 6–8 L’va Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg 197022

References

  1. Sidaway P. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts prostate cancer prognosis. Nat Rev Urol 2015;12(5):238. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.69
  2. Mantovani A., Allavena P., Sica A. et al. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 2008;454:436–44. doi: 10.1038/nature07205
  3. Gokce M.I., Hamidi N., Suer E. et al. Evaluation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio prior to prostate biopsy to predict biopsy histology: Results of 1836 patients. Can Urol Assoc J 2015;9(11–12): E761–65.doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3091
  4. Templeton A.J., McNamara M.G., Šeruga B. et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106(6):dju124. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju124
  5. Minardi D., Scartozzi M., Montesi L. et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may be associated with the outcome in patients with prostate cancer. springerplus 2015;4:255. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1036-1
  6. Lu Y., Huang H.H., Lau W.K.O. Evaluation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in a Singapore cohort of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy. World J Urol 2020;38(1):103–9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02752-4
  7. Prostate cancer. Clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of Russia, 2021. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/ view-cr/12_3 (accessed: 01.10.2025).
  8. Mohler J.L., Kantoff P.W., Armstrong A.J. et al. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Prostate cancer, version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2014;12(5):686–718. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0072
  9. Reva S.A., Nosov А.K., Korol V.D. et al. Comparison of treatment results for patients with high-risk prostate cancer according to the EAU and NCCN criteria. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2021;17(2):54–61. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2021-17-2-54-61
  10. Briganti A., Larcher A., Abdollah F. et al. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol 2012;61(3):480–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.044
  11. Gandaglia G., Ploussard G., Valerio M. et al. A Novel nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsies. Eur Urol 2019;75(3):506–14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012
  12. Petrov S.B., Arnautov A.V., Nikulina K.A. et al. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2025;21(3):69–81. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2025-21-3-69-81
  13. Kurbegovic S., Berg K.D., Thomsen F.B. et al. The risk of biochemical recurrence for intermediate-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol 2017;51(6):450–6. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1356369
  14. Waisman Malaret A.J., Chang P., Zhu K. et al. Evaluating the outcomes of active surveillance in grade group 2 prostate cancer: prospective results from the Canary PASS Cohort. J Urol 2022;207(4):805–13. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002354
  15. D’Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S. et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998;280(11):969–74. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.11.969
  16. Heidland A., Klassen A., Rutkowski P., Bahner U. The contribution of Rudolf Virchow to the concept of inflammation: what is still of importance? J Nephrol 2006;19 Suppl 10:S102–9.
  17. Coffelt S.B., de Visser K.E. Cancer: inflammation lights the way to metastasis. Nature 2014;507(7490):48–9. doi: 10.1038/nature13062
  18. Zhang G.M., Zhu Y., Ma X.C. et al. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: a predictor of advanced prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence in patients receiving radical prostatectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94(41):e1473. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001473
  19. Guo J., Fang J., Huang X. et al. Prognostic role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of results from multivariate analysis. Int J Surg 2018;60:216–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.020
  20. Zapała P., Garbas K., Lewandowski Z. et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts nodal involvement in unfavourable, clinically nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients and overall survival in pN1 patients. Sci Rep 2023;13:392. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27542-2
  21. Qi W., Zhou Y., Liu Z. et al. Revealing the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with different stage prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:1052943. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1052943
  22. Zhang B., Xu T. Prognostic significance of pretreatment systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Onc 2023;21:2. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02878-7
  23. Chen Z., Zhang Y., Chen W. Prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol 2025;16:1465971. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1465971
  24. Wang J., Zhou X., He Y. et al. Prognostic role of platelet to lymphocyte ratio in prostate cancer: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97(40):e12504. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012504
  25. Salciccia S., Frisenda M., Bevilacqua G. et al. Prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-metastatic and metastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Asian J Urol 2024;11(2):191–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.01.002

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 ABV-Press

License URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/about/editorialPolicies

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-36986 от  21.07.2009.