The use of fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) for sentinel lymph node detection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Prostate cancer is the most common malignant neoplasm among men and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality. According to studies, lymph node metastases are detected in approximately 15 % of patients after radical prostatectomy combined with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. In line with the European Association of Urology guidelines, extended pelvic lymph node dissection should be performed in high-risk prostate cancer cases and in intermediate-risk patients where validated nomograms predict a significant likelihood of lymph node involvement.

Modern surgical practice emphasizes the development of high-precision intraoperative imaging techniques to enhance the efficacy of interventions. One such innovative method is near-infrared fluorescence imaging, which utilizes fluorophores – substances that emit light upon laser excitation. For example, indocyanine green (ICG) is used as a contrast agent for fluorescence-guided surgery, improving tissue structure identification and surgical precision.

Aim. To evaluate the feasibility of fluorescence diagnostics using ICG during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection.

Materials and methods. At the A. I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry’s Urology Clinic (based at the S. I. Spasokukotsky City Clinical Hospital, Moscow Healthcare Department), 12 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were analyzed between 2022 and 2023. Inclusion criteria were localized prostate cancer with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma (Gleason score ≥7 (3 + 4)) and preoperative risk of lymph node metastasis exceeding 5 % as per the A. Briganti et al. (2012) nomogram. All patients underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. During surgery, intraprostatic injection of ICG solution was performed after prostate isolation, followed by fluorescence imaging of lymph nodes using the FireFly™ mode on the DaVinci Xi™ robotic system.

Results. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 6) included patients with MRI-suspected pelvic lymph node metastases, and Group 2 (n = 6) had no imaging abnormalities. Postoperative histology revealed lymph node metastases in 5/6 patients in Group 1. In one patient from Group 1, metastatic involvement was confined to a single sentinel lymph node, which was visualized using ICG. No metastases were detected in Group 2. The mean fluorescence visualization time for pelvic lymph nodes was 17 minutes. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified in 6/12 patients, with intraoperative frozen section analysis confirming metastatic spread into these nodes.

Conclusion. Intraoperative fluorescence diagnostics with ICG is a safe and practical method to improve surgical outcomes in prostate cancer treatment. ICG enhances the identification of key anatomical landmarks and pathological structures. Sentinel lymph node biopsy may reduce complications associated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection and improve staging by enabling targeted removal of metastatic lymph nodes beyond the standard pelvic lymph node dissection template.

About the authors

Genrikh A. Monastyrnyy

S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department; Russian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: genrix1000@gmail.com

Department of Urology

Russian Federation, 5 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284; Build. 1, 20 Delegatskaya St., Moscow 127473

A. O. Vasilyev

S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department; Russian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of Russia; Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Medical Management, Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: genrix1000@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5468-0011

Department of Urology

Russian Federation, 5 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284; Build. 1, 20 Delegatskaya St., Moscow 127473; 9 Sharikopodshipnikovskaya St., Moscow 115088

A. V. Govorov

S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department; Russian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: genrix1000@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3299-0574

Department of Urology

Russian Federation, 5 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284; Build. 1, 20 Delegatskaya St., Moscow 127473

F. A. Medvedev

Russian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: genrix1000@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0460-4816

Department of Urology

Russian Federation, Build. 1, 20 Delegatskaya St., Moscow 127473

D. Yu. Pushkar

S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department; Russian University of Medicine, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: genrix1000@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6096-5723

Department of Urology

Russian Federation, 5 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284; Build. 1, 20 Delegatskaya St., Moscow 127473

References

  1. Каприн А.Д., Алексеев Б.Я., Матвеев В.Б. и др. Рак предстательной железы. Клинические рекомендации. Современная онкология 2021;23(2):211–47. doi: 10.26442/18151434.2021.2.200959 Kaprin A.D., Alekseev B.Ya., Matveev V.B. et al. Prostate Cancer. Clinical Guidelines. Sovremennaya onkologiya = Modern Oncology 2021;23(2):211–47. (In Russ.). doi: 10.26442/18151434.2021.2.200959
  2. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2018 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2019. 250 с. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2018 (morbidity and mortality). Eds.: А.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2019. 250 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Abdollah F., Suardi N., Gallina A. et al. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: a 20-year audit in a single center. Ann Oncol 2013;24:1459–66. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt120
  4. Briganti A., Larcher A., Abdollah F. et al. Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol 2011;61:480–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.044
  5. EAU Guidelines. Proceedings of the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023, Milan, Italy, 10–13 March 2023.
  6. Fossati N., Willemse P.P.M., van den Broeck T. et al. The benefits and harms of different extents of lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2017;72(1):84–109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003
  7. Perera M., McGrath S., Sengupta S. et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2018;15(11):686–92. doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0066-1
  8. Yadav K. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: an update in testicular malignancies. Clin Transl Oncol 2017;19(7):793–8. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1622-5
  9. Fujimoto N., Shiota M., Tomisaki I. et al. Reconsideration on clinical beneft of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Urol Int 2019;103(2):125–36. doi: 10.1159/000497280
  10. Briganti A., Blute M.L., Eastham J.H. et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2009;55(6):1251–65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.012
  11. Keegan K.A., Cookson M.S. Complications of pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2011;12(3):203–8. doi: 10.1007/s11934-011-0179-z
  12. Tyritzis S.I., Kalampokis N., Grivas N. et al. Robot-assisted extended lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer. Miner Chir 2019;74(1):88–96. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07780-5
  13. Аляев Ю.Г., Безруков Е.А., Сирота Е.С., Морозов А.О. Флуоресцентная визуализация индоцианиновым зеленым в урологии. Урология 2016;(1):106–10. Alyaev Yu.G., Bezrukov E.A., Sirota E.S., Morozov A.O. Fluorescent visualization with indocyanine green in urology. Urologiya = Urology 2016;(1):106–10. (In Russ.).
  14. Kaplan-Marans E., Fulla J., Tomer N. et al. Indocyanine Green (ICG) in Urologic Surgery. Urology 2019;132:10–7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.008
  15. Savio L.F., Panizzutti Barboza M., Alameddine M. et al. Combined partial penectomy with bilateral robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy using near-infrared fluorescence guidance. Urology 2018;113:251. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.021
  16. Bjurlin M.A., Zhao L.C., Kenigsberg A.P. et al. Novel use of fluorescence lymphangiography during robotic groin dissection for penile cancer. Urology 2017;107:267. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.05.026
  17. Tomita K., Kageyama S., Hanada E. et al. Indocyanine green angiography-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy. Urology 2017;106:221–5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.027
  18. Shibata Y., Kurihara S., Arai S. et al. Efficacy of indocyanine green angiography on microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. J Invest Surg 2017;30(4):247–51. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2016.1236855
  19. Cacciamani G.E., Shakir A., Tafuri A. et al. Best practices in near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (NIRF/ICG)-guided robotic urologic surgery: a systematic review-based expert consensus. World J Urol 2019;38(4):883–96. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02870-z
  20. Hope-Ross M., Yannuzzi L.A., Gragoudas E.S. et al. Adverse reactions due to indocyanine green. Ophthalmology 1994;101(3):529–33. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31303-0
  21. Weckermann D., Dorn R., Holl G. et al. Limitations of radioguided surgery in high-risk prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2007;51(6):1548–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.049
  22. Metcalf K.S., Peel K.R. Lymphocele. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1993;75(6):387–92.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 ABV-Press

License URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/about/editorialPolicies

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-36986 от  21.07.2009.