Variants of the anatomy of the renal vascular bed in patients with retroperitoneal germ cell tumors

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Renovascular anatomy is characterized by complex morphological variations in relation to the number, origin level, length, diameter and topographic relationships of the vessels. Understanding of individual vascular anatomy during the planning of surgical intervention in the retroperitoneal space allows to decrease technical difficulty and achieve better perioperative results.

Aim. To study frequencies of renal vessel variant anatomies that can become intraoperative finds in patients with germ cell tumors of the retroperitoneal location due to incomplete preoperative examination creating technical difficulties during surgical treatment.

Materials and methods. At the first stage, comparison of a group of 407 patients with germ cell tumors with a control group (401 patients with other oncological diseases) by the presence of vascular anomalies was performed. The second stage consisted of intragroup analysis of operative time, blood loss volume and complications in patients after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection depending on the identified vascular anomaly.

Results. Anomalies of renal arteries were identified in 73.2 % of cases in the germ cell tumor group which significantly differed from the control group value of 24.9 % (р = 0.001). The frequency of renal vein anomalies in germ cell tumors was 69.0 % compared to 12.5 % in the control group (р < 0.05). Median operative time in the total group was 217.2 ± 0.7 min. Statistically significant differences in increase of operative time in the presence of additional arteries (р = 0.001) and veins (р = 0.002) were observed. Total mean blood loss volume was 389 ± 51.4 mL. Intraoperative blood loss volume significantly depended on injury of additional arteries (р = 0.003) and veins (р = 0.002). Intraoperative complications associated with injury of the main large vessels were observed in 18.7 % of cases. Clinically significand trend was observed towards decreased intraoperative injury of additional and main vessels (total number of injuries 36 (8.9 %) and 76 (18.7 %), respectively; р = 0.017) and, therefore, decreased risk of surgical complications after accumulation of experience in retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and introduction of computed tomography with 3D reconstruction of renal vessels in 2018.

Conclusion. Frequency and diversity of various vessels of the retroperitoneal space in patients with germ cell tumors require careful preoperative preparation of the patients in the form of topographic visualization of the vascular network.

About the authors

Eldar M. Mamizhev

City Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Saint Petersburg

Author for correspondence.
Email: mamijev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6883-777X
Russian Federation, 56 Veteranova Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255

R. V. Orlova

City Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Saint Petersburg

Email: mamijev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4447-9458
Russian Federation, 56 Veteranova Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255

D. I. Rumyantseva

Clinic of High Medical Technologies named after N.I. Pirogov, Saint Petersburg State University

Email: mamijev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8067-9150
Russian Federation, 154 Naberezhnaya Reki Fontanki, Saint Petersburg 190020

R. A. Melikov

City Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Saint Petersburg

Email: mamijev@mail.ru
Russian Federation, 56 Veteranova Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255

Z. A. Tambiyeva

North Caucasian State Academy

Email: mamijev@mail.ru
Russian Federation, 36 Stavropolskaya St., Cherkessk 369001, Karachay-Cherkess Republic

A. G. Karakhanova

N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: mamijev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1913-9390
Russian Federation, 68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy, Saint Petersburg 197758

N. F. Krotov

N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: mamijev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5590-8804
Russian Federation, 68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy, Saint Petersburg 197758

A. K. Nosov

N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: mamijev@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3850-7109
Russian Federation, 68 Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyy, Saint Petersburg 197758

References

  1. Beck S.D., Foster R.S., Bihrle R. et al. Is full bilateral retroperitoneal lymph node dissection always necessary for postchemotherapy residual tumor? Cancer 2007;110(6): 1235–40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22898
  2. Busch J., Magheli A., Erber B. et al. Laparoscopic and open postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with advanced testicular cancer--a single center analysis. BMC Urol 2012;12:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-12-15
  3. Opitz I., Gantert W., Giger U. et al. Bleeding remains a major complica- tion during laparoscopic surgery: analysis of the SALTS database. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005;390:128–33.
  4. Macleod L.C., Rajanahally S., Nayak J.G. et al. Characterizing the mor- bidity of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testis cancer in a national cohort of privately insured patients. Urology 2016;91:70–6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.010
  5. Wysocki A.P., Hetherington R., Nicol D. et al. Haemodynamic assess- ment following inferior vena cava resection without replacement. ANZ J Surg 2004;74(8):667–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03127.x
  6. Corral D.A., Varma D.G., Jackson E.F. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography before postchemotherapy ret- roperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urology 2000;55(2):262–6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00428-8
  7. Djaladat H., Nichols C., Daneshmand S. Adjuvant surgery in testicu- lar cancer patients undergoing postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19(7):2388–93. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2284-8
  8. Donohue J.P., Thornhill J.A., Foster R.S. et al. Vascular considerations in postchemotherapy. Retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection: part II. World J Urol 1994;12(4):187–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00185669
  9. MacLennan, Gregory T. Hinman’s atlas of urosurgical anatomy, 2012.
  10. Mathews R., Smith P.A., Fishman E.K. et al. Anomalies of the inferior vena cava and renal veins: embryologic and surgical considerations. Urology 1999;53(5):873–80. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00007-2
  11. Babaian R.J., Johnson D.E. Major venous anomalies complicating ret- roperitoneal surgery. South Med J 1979;72(10):1254–8. doi: 10.1097/00007611-197910000-00012
  12. Mayo J., Gray R., St Louis E. et al. Anomalies of the inferior vena cava. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;140(2):339–45. doi: 10.2214/ajr.140.2.339
  13. Malaki M., Willis A.P., Jones R.G. Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava. Clin Radiol 2012;67(2):165–71. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.08.006
  14. Baniel J., Foster R.S., Donohue J.P. Surgical anatomy of the lumbar vessels: implications for retroperitoneal surgery. J Urol 1995;153(5):1422–5.
  15. Beck S.D., Lalka S.G. Long-term results after inferior vena caval resec- tion during retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for metastatic germ cell cancer. J Vasc Surg 1998;28(5):808–14. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70055-2

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 ABV-Press

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-36986 от  21.07.2009.