Long-term outcomes of hypofractionated radiation therapy in patients with high risk prostate cancer
- Authors: Bulychkin P.V.1, Ekaterinushkin D.A.2, Tkachev S.I.1, Khachaturyan A.V.1, Nayanov G.B.2, Ladyko D.D.1, Selezneva T.D.3
-
Affiliations:
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary
- Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: Vol 20, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 60-66
- Section: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM TUMORS. PROSTATE CANCER
- Published: 17.05.2024
- URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1733
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-1-60-66
- ID: 1733
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background. Hypofractionated radiation therapy is a standard radical approach for treatment of patients with localized prostate cancer of low and intermediate risk. Clinical practice of applying this approach in patients with high and very high risk of progression has not been established.
Aim: improving the effectiveness of hormonal/radiation therapy in patients with high and very high risk prostate cancer using an original radiotherapy technique.
Materials and methods. In 2012, a new technique of hypofractionated radiation therapy based on simultaneous integrated boost aimed at the prostate, seminal vesicles, and regional lymph nodes was developed at the Radiotherapy Department of the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology. The phase II single-center prospective cohort trial included 40 patients with high and very high risk prostate cancer who received combination hormonal/ radiation therapy between 2012 and 2018. Median follow-up was 96 (61–124) months.
Results. None of the patients had grade III–IV adverse events (according to the RTOG/EORTC scale) in the distal parts of the gastrointestinal tract and urogenital system. Five-year biochemical and local controls were 80 % and 100 %, respectively.
Conclusion. The results of this study show that the developed hypofractionated radiation therapy technique is safe with 5-year biochemical control outcomes matching reported in the literature. However, to determine true clinical significance of the technique, initiation of a randomized phase III trial is required.
About the authors
P. V. Bulychkin
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: petrbulychkin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3947-1267
Petr V. Bulychkin.
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Russian FederationD. A. Ekaterinushkin
Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2337-9303
1B Smirnovskoe Ushchelie Microdistrict, Saratov 410053
Russian FederationS. I. Tkachev
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8965-8172
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Russian FederationA. V. Khachaturyan
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3774-2879
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Russian FederationG. B. Nayanov
Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-5714-2637
1B Smirnovskoe Ushchelie Microdistrict, Saratov 410053
Russian FederationD. D. Ladyko
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Russian FederationT. D. Selezneva
Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky, Ministry of Health of Russia
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8652-8700
112 Bol’shaya Kazach’ya St., Saratov 410012
Russian FederationReferences
- Malignant tumors in Russia in 2021 (morbidity and mortality). Eds.: А.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2022. 252 p. (In Russ.).
- Krasheninnikov A.A., Alekseev B.Ya, Nyushko K.M. et al. Treatment of patients with prostate cancer at high risk of its progression. Onkologiya. Zhurnal im. P.A. Gertsena = P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology 2019;8(6):460–5. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/onkolog20198061460
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.
- Dearnaley D.P., Jovic G., Syndikus I. et al. Escalated-dose versus control-dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: long-term results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15(4):464–73. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70040-3
- Peeters S.T., Heemsbergen W.D., Koper P.C. et al. Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy. J Clin Oncol 2006;24(13):1990–6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2530
- Murthy V., Maitre P., Kannan S. et al. Prostate-only versus whole-pelvic radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer (POP-RT): outcomes from phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2021;39(11):1234–42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03282
- Hennequin C., Sargos P., Roca L. et al. Long-term results of dose escalation (80 vs 70 Gy) combined with long-term androgen deprivation in high-risk prostate cancers: GETUG-AFU 18 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2024;42(4_suppl). doi: 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.LBA259
Supplementary files

