Cytoreductive nephrectomy and its effect on prognosis in patients with disseminated renal cell carcinoma receiving treatment in wide clinical practice
- Authors: Semenov D.V.1,2, Orlova R.V.1,2, Shirokorad V.I.3, Kostritskiy S.V.3, Gluzman M.I.1,2, Korneva Y.S.4,5,6
-
Affiliations:
- Saint Petersburg State University
- City Clinical Oncological Dispensary
- Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow Healthcare Department
- City Hospital No. 26
- Smolensk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- I.I. Mechnikov North-West State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: Vol 19, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 31-44
- Section: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM TUMORS. RENAL CANCER
- Published: 15.11.2023
- URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1687
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2023-19-3-31-44
- ID: 1687
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the effect of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) on overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and to identify a group of patients who are candidates for cytoreductive surgical treatment.
Materials and methods. We retrospectively analyzed a database of 403 patients with mRCC treated at the Moscow City Oncological Hospital No. 62 and the City Clinical Oncological Dispensary (Saint Petersburg) between 2006 and 2022. In total, 330 (81.9 %) patients underwent CN. All patients received systemic anti-tumor therapy: targeted anti-angiogenic therapy - 317 (78.6 %), cytokines - 61 (15.1 %), checkpoint inhibitors - 25 (6.2 %). The groups of operated and non-operated patients were unbalanced: CN was more often not performed in patients with multiple metastases, bone and liver lesions, laboratory abnormalities (anemia, increased serum alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase) and unfavorable prognosis per IMDC (International mRCC Database Consortium) classification (p >0.05 for all).
Results. CN was associated with a significant increase in OS compared with primary tumor preservation in situ: median OS was 36 months with 95 % confidence interval 29.1-37.1, and 11 months with 95 % confidence interval 8.1-21.3, respectively (p <0.0001). The benefit for OS in the CN group was also observed in clear-cell mRCC (p <0.0001), grade G3 (p <0.0001), multiple metastases (p <0.0001) groups, and in the IMDC poor prognosis group (p <0.0001).
Conclusion. CN in selected mRCC patients results in a significant increase in OS. Further research is needed to determine selection criteria for surgical treatment candidates.
About the authors
D. V. Semenov
Saint Petersburg State University; City Clinical Oncological Dispensary
Author for correspondence.
Email: sema.69@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4335-8446
Dmitriy V. Semenov.
7-9 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, Saint Petersburg 199034; 56 Veteranov Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255
Russian FederationR. V. Orlova
Saint Petersburg State University; City Clinical Oncological Dispensary
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9368-5517
7-9 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, Saint Petersburg 199034; 56 Veteranov Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255
Russian FederationV. I. Shirokorad
Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow Healthcare Department
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4109-6451
27 Istra, Moscow Region 143515
Russian FederationS. V. Kostritskiy
Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62, Moscow Healthcare Department
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4494-1489
27 Istra, Moscow Region 143515
Russian FederationM. I. Gluzman
Saint Petersburg State University; City Clinical Oncological Dispensary
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8965-8364
7-9 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, Saint Petersburg 199034; 56 Veteranov Prospekt, Saint Petersburg 198255
Russian FederationYu. S. Korneva
City Hospital No. 26; Smolensk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; I.I. Mechnikov North-West State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8080-904X
Department of Pathological Anatomy, Smolensk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia.
2 Kostyushko St., Saint Petersburg 196247; 28 Krupskoy St., Smolensk 214019; 41 Kirochnaya St., Saint Petersburg 191015
Russian FederationReferences
- Capitanio U., Bensalah K., Bex A. et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2019;75(1):74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.036
- Ljungberg B., Albiges L., Abu-Ghanem Y. et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2019 update. Eur Urol 2019;75(5):799-810. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011
- Flanigan R.C., Salmon S.E., Blumenstein B.A. et al. Nephrectomy followed by interferon alfa-2b compared with interferon alfa-2b alone for metastatic renal-cell cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345(23):1655-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa003013
- Mickisch G.H., Garin A., van Poppel H. et al. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Genitourinary Group. Radical nephrectomy plus interferon-alfa-based immunotherapy compared with interferon alfa alone in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001;358(9286):966-70. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06103-7
- Flanigan R.C., Mickisch G., Sylvester R. et al. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cancer: a combined analysis. J Urol 2004;171(3):1071-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000110610.61545.ae
- Heng D.Y., Wells J.C., Rini B.I. et al. Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastases from renal cell carcinoma: results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. Eur Urol 2014;66(4):704-10. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.034
- Mejean A., Ravaud A., Thezenas S. et al. Sunitinib alone or after nephrectomy in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018;379(5):417-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803675
- Bex A., Mulders P., Jewett M. et al. Comparison of immediate vs deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib: the SURTIME randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;5(2):164-70. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5543
- Motzer R.J., Jonasch E., Michaelson M.D. et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: kidney cancer, version 2.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019;17(11):1278-85. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0054
- Xiao W.J., Zhu Y., Dai B. et al. Assessment of survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma after radical cytoreductive nephrectomy versus no surgery: a SEER analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2015;41(2):288-95. doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.15
- Hanna N., Sun M., Meyer C.P. et al. Survival analyses of patients with metastatic renal cancer treated with targeted therapy with or without cytoreductive nephrectomy: a National Cancer Data Base study. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(27):3267-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.7931
- Arora S., Sood A., Dalela D. et al. Cytoreductive nephrectomy: assessing the generalizability of the CARMENA trial to real-world national cancer data base cases. Eur Urol 2019;75(2):352-3. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.054
- Bhindi B., Abel E.J., Albiges L. et al. Systematic review of the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the targeted therapy era and beyond: an individualized approach to metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2019;75(1):111-28. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.016
- Singla N., Hutchinson R.C., Ghandour R.A. et al. Improved survival after cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the contemporary immunotherapy era: an analysis of the National Cancer Database. Urol Oncol 2020;38(6):604.e9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.029
- I.N. Group SO. Comparing the outcome of immunotherapy-based drug combination therapy with or without surgery to remove the kidney in metastatic kidney cancer, the PROBE trial (PROBE).
- Deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The NORDIC-SUN-Trial (NORDIC-SUN). Sponsor: Donskov F., Aarhus University Hospital. doi: 10.31525/ct1-nct03977571
- Mejean A., Ravaud A., Thezenas S. et al. Sunitinib alone or after nephrectomy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: is there still a role for cytoreductive nephrectomy? Eur Urol 2021;80(4):417-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.009
- Kato R., Naito S., Numakura K. et al. Significance of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy stratified by IMDC risk for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in targeted therapy era - a multi-institutional retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol 2022;27(3):563-73. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02091-8
- Esagian S.M., Ziogas I.A., Kosmidis D. et al. Long-term survival outcomes of cytoreductive nephrectomy combined with targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13(4):695. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040695
- Bhindi B., Graham J., Wells J.C. et al. Deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2020;78(4):615-23. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.04.038
- De Bruijn R., Wimalasingham A., Szabados B. et al. Deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy following presurgical vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in patients with primary metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a pooled analysis of prospective trial data. Eur Urol Oncol 2020;3(2):168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.12.004
- Bakouny Z., El Zarif T., Dudani S. et al. Upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapy: an observational study from the international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium. Eur Urol 2022;83(2):145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.004
- Westerman M.E., Shapiro D.D., Tannir N.M. et al. Survival following cytoreductive nephrectomy: a comparison of existing prognostic models. BJU Int 2020;126(6):745-53. doi: 10.1111/bju.15160
- Mori K., Quhal F., Yanagisawa T. et al. The effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with and without previous cytoreductive nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol 2022;108:10872. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108720
Supplementary files

