Email this article Diagnostic possibilities of Magnetic Resonance Imaging body coil in the determining of prostate cancer stage
- Authors: Kitayev S.V.1, Pavlenko K.A.1, Volkov T.V.1, Kochin A.V.1, Zhdanov A.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- A.I. Burnazyan Clinical hospital №6 of Federal Medical Biologic Agency of Russia, Moscow
- Issue: Vol 4, No 4 (2008)
- Pages: 25-29
- Section: DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF URINARY SYSTEM TUMORS. PROSTATE CANCER
- Published: 30.12.2008
- URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1025
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2008-4-4-25-29
- ID: 1025
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Purpose: to define diagnostic possibilities of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with body coil in the determining of the stage and local extent of prostate cancer.
Materials and methods: Analysis of MRI studies of 49 patients aged from 48 to 78 (65±6) with confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy in 2007 was carried out.
Conclusions: sensitivity of MRI in terms of primary diagnosis was 84% and in detection of prostate gland capsule invasion — 62%, specificity was 92%. Sensitivity of the method in terms of determining the invasion of seminal vesicles was 75% and specificity — 97%. At last, sensitivity of the method in the diagnosis of regional lymph node involvement was 40% and specificity — 98%.
Conclusion: application of MRI with surface coil allows defining the local extent of the tumor, its size and invasion of prostate gland capsule.
About the authors
S. V. Kitayev
A.I. Burnazyan Clinical hospital №6 of Federal Medical Biologic Agency of Russia, Moscow
Author for correspondence.
Department of MRI diagnistics, Department of Urology, Department of pathomorphology Russian Federation
K. A. Pavlenko
A.I. Burnazyan Clinical hospital №6 of Federal Medical Biologic Agency of Russia, MoscowDepartment of MRI diagnistics, Department of Urology, Department of pathomorphology Russian Federation
T. V. Volkov
A.I. Burnazyan Clinical hospital №6 of Federal Medical Biologic Agency of Russia, MoscowDepartment of MRI diagnistics, Department of Urology, Department of pathomorphology Russian Federation
A. V. Kochin
A.I. Burnazyan Clinical hospital №6 of Federal Medical Biologic Agency of Russia, MoscowDepartment of MRI diagnistics, Department of Urology, Department of pathomorphology Russian Federation
A. S. Zhdanov
A.I. Burnazyan Clinical hospital №6 of Federal Medical Biologic Agency of Russia, MoscowDepartment of MRI diagnistics, Department of Urology, Department of pathomorphology Russian Federation
References
Supplementary files
